[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.32-27.49 --- linux (2.6.32-27.49) lucid-proposed; urgency=low [ Leann Ogasawara ] - LP: #683425 * Revert "SAUCE: AF_ECONET prevent kernel stack overflow" * Revert "SAUCE: AF_ECONET SIOCSIFADDR ioctl does not check privileges" *

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-20 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683425 Title: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-17 Thread Marc Tardif
To follow up on the report provided by Brendan, I can confirm the suspicion that the remaining systems to be tested indeed failed because of problems with the infrastructure. We will try to resolve these problems for the next SRU. The new kernel installed successfully on 67 out of 75 certification

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-16 Thread Brendan Donegan
Here are the test results from Hw-Cert for Lucid : http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/current/lucid- proposed.html The failures that exist are suspected to be down to infrastructure, although we are still investigating and will confirm by Friday. -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
marking as v-needed until we receive the results from the cert testing. ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Tags removed: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683425 Titl

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683425 Title: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-15 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
We ran the Regression Testing on the proposed kernel and did not find any regression with it, as for us the kernel is good to go. The results of the LTP, Autotest, and qa-regression-testing are available at: http://people.canonical.com/~pedro/kernel/kernel-2.6.32-27.49/ . -- You received this bug

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-14 Thread Brendan Donegan
HW Certification has started SRU testing for Lucid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683425 Title: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-09 Thread Steve Conklin
All bugs required for this kernel have been verified. Therefore, no reverts are necessary, and this kernel can move directly into the Testing phase. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683425

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ara Pulido (apulido) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 683425] Re: Lucid: 2.6.32-27.49 -proposed tracker

2010-12-08 Thread Martin Pitt
This upload's changelog claims to fix bug 613381, but this bug is already fixed in lucid and maverick (but still open in natty). What's the deal with this one? ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Inv