[Bug 66475] Re: [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal

2006-12-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
+1 -- [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal https://launchpad.net/bugs/66475 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 66475] Re: [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal

2006-12-03 Thread Daniel T Chen
Looks good, +1. -- [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal https://launchpad.net/bugs/66475 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 66475] Re: [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal

2006-12-03 Thread StefanPotyra
+1 -- [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal https://launchpad.net/bugs/66475 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 66475] Re: [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal

2006-12-03 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
** Attachment added: "build log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5238998/edgy.log ** Description changed: Requesting update for idjc in edgy. - Current 0.6.5-0ubuntu1 package doesn't build. That's a very little - patch, and not much risks of regression. + Current 0.6.5-0ubuntu1 package do

[Bug 66475] Re: [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal

2006-12-03 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
I updated the description and attached a new patch. If that's still OK, I'll ask a MOTU to upload it. -- [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal https://launchpad.net/bugs/66475 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 66475] Re: [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal

2006-12-03 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
** Summary changed: - [DEBDIFF] Dependency problem + [edgy] MOTU SRU proposal ** Description changed: - idjc is in the "dependency wait" state for about a month. - As we can read on https://launchpad.net/+builds/+build/248162, it is waiting for liblame-dev and libfaad2-dev. - But idjc is in un