On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:16:37AM -, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Let me be more clear: the issue that python packages are held back
> should be fixed, not the upstart is held-back because of its
> essentialness.
Agreed; please file a separate bug about that.
--
- mdz
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upg
Let me be more clear: the issue that python packages are held back
should be fixed, not the upstart is held-back because of its
essentialness.
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
This is fixed with a adjustment how the problem resolver works in
0.6.46.4ubuntu4.
Cheers,
Michael
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 07:39:58PM -, Jason wrote:
> I agree that update-manager is the preferred method for upgrading, but a
> LOT of people have had issues with this.
A lot of people have had good experiences as well; if you had a problem,
please file a bug report on update-manager with comp
Matt,
I agree that update-manager is the preferred method for upgrading, but a
LOT of people have had issues with this. I apologize for posting my
advice on a bug report - this discussion should be used for fixing the
problem instead of figuring out workarounds.
Regards,
Jason
--
dapper -> edg
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:19:24PM -, Jason wrote:
> I read on a forum post
> (http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=228788) to use aptitude
> instead of update manager or apt-get because it handles dependencies
> better. I ran dist-upgrade twice to get the new upstart package (as
> wel
I read on a forum post
(http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=228788) to use aptitude
instead of update manager or apt-get because it handles dependencies
better. I ran dist-upgrade twice to get the new upstart package (as
well as others), but after that I got the EXACT same packages being
** Tags added: edgy-upgrade
** Tags removed: edgy-upgrades
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This is not a problem with upstart; it's just an APT problem, it's
noting the Essential tag of the installed version of sysvinit, and not
noting it's been removed in the available version.
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds
I had similar problems, after running apt-get -f install seems to fixed
most problems. You might want to try using aptitude, this seems to have
worked with the hpijs package.
** Also affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade hold
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 08:33:46AM -, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> So is there a solution for this available? Using KDE, updated via
> changing sources.list and update & dist-upgrade several times and hpijs
> won't install. All other packages are ok.
Different problem.
--
- mdz
--
dapper -> e
So is there a solution for this available? Using KDE, updated via
changing sources.list and update & dist-upgrade several times and hpijs
won't install. All other packages are ok.
In the end I was able to sudo apt-get install hpijs and after this
upgrade was ok.
Too bad if command line dist-upgra
(documented and not fixable any further => removing milestone)
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This has been documented in the release notes. Scott thinks it's
unfixable (and it probably is, now) - should this be rejected now?
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Target: ubuntu-6.10 => None
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ub
I added instructions about this to the edgy release notes.
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Vogt
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Matt i don't understand the point of cherry-picking the packages to be
hounest. They are all in main and installable on server or desktop or i
could have an LTSP server or whatever.. i don't think that it does
really matter if it's package foo or bar here.. we are supporting them
and clean upgrade
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:04:01PM -, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> ubuntu-minimal is installed on server too.
ubuntu-minimal doesn't include python-* however.
--
- mdz
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
ubuntu-minimal is installed on server too.
Fabio
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:43:23AM -, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> This is going to break server upgrades since we have no such upgrader on
> them. I don't think targeting it for edgy-upgrades is the right thing to
> do and we did never had the need to run it twice before. IMHO this isn't
>
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I have a text-frontend for the upgrader that could be used by server
people. We just would need something like the update-manager for the
server to actually fetches/executes the upgrader. A simple shell script
will be enough (wget/tar is all needed). The dist-upgrader can easily
fallback to the tex
Yes, the upgrades deal with both the python upgrades and the upstart
upgrade.
The problem with the essential package is that apt assign this property
to the installed package, not the candidateVersion. This means that the
resolver will not touch it unless a non-essential version is installed.
The
This is going to break server upgrades since we have no such upgrader on
them. I don't think targeting it for edgy-upgrades is the right thing to
do and we did never had the need to run it twice before. IMHO this isn't
nice.
Fabio
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
http
This is why we have the upgrader. Michael, can you confirm that the
upgrader does the right thing? If so, this bug isn't a problem for the
final release. Desktop upgrades should use the tool unless the user is
comfortable working through situations like this with the command line.
** Tags added
The held back due to upstart problem is known, just run dist-upgrade a
second time.
We figured most people who use APT are used to running it multiple times
until it sticks
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Summary changed:
- dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade
+ dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
--
dapper -> edgy dist-upgrade holds back essential packages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63680
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/
28 matches
Mail list logo
