Launchpad has imported 9 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643320.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help
On 10/16/2010 10:59 AM, tombert wrote:
> Today I installed a fresh 10.10 Desktop, then did an online update and the
> reboot failed with the same error. I wasn't able to fix it with all the tips
> from papa google like fsck, update-grub ... so I'am currently re-installing
> the system.
> So here
Today I installed a fresh 10.10 Desktop, then did an online update and the
reboot failed with the same error. I wasn't able to fix it with all the tips
from papa google like fsck, update-grub ... so I'am currently re-installing the
system.
So here my questions: Is this the same bug? and when is
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #643320
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643320
** Also affects: unetbootin (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643320
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No
This bug was fixed in the package unetbootin - 408-1ubuntu0.10.04.2
---
unetbootin (408-1ubuntu0.10.04.2) lucid-proposed; urgency=low
* Fixes issues when loading Ubuntu 10.10 desktop iso. (LP: #615285)
-- Geza KovacsWed, 06 Oct 2010 15:33:58 -0400
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ub
Nevermind, I just noticed that there's a mandatory 7-day waiting period
for SRUs. Since this probably won't get an exception, I've put a notice
on the UNetbootin home page warning users not to use the lucid package
so hopefully that will take care of most of the unnecessary duplicate
bug reports.
Is there anything else that needs to be done before this fix can be
moved from lucid-proposed to lucid-updates? The SRU page doesn't seem to
indicate anything else after verifications, and if at all possible I'd
like to avoid having a huge influx of bug reports and negative reviews
from lucid users
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
The lucid-proposed package seems to work correctly with the 32-bit
Ubuntu 10.10 RC iso.
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/unetbootin
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Accepted unetbootin into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added: verification-needed
-
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: Luke Faraone (lfaraone) => (unassigned)
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You rece
** Description changed:
+ == BEGIN SRU INFO ==
+ This bug prevents anybody running Lucid from using Unetbootin with a Maverick
ISO image.
+
+ The upstream developer has tested the proposed Lucid update against
+ ubuntu-10.10-rc-desktop-amd64.iso and ubuntu-10.04-desktop-i386.iso.
+
+ == STEPS
** Also affects: unetbootin (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Luke Faraone (lfaraone)
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu
Never mind, it was my fault.
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
Sorry for spamming up the thread, but I am glad I found this thread
after cursing over why the 10.10 RC won't boot up on my netbook after
using unetbootin in 10.04 to copy the iso to a usb stick.
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/6
This bug is still present in 4.90 with Ubuntu 10.10 RC.
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
This bug still exists in Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid. I would expect most people
that use unetbootin to create installable USB media use Lucid and they
will so encounter this bug.
It would be great to see either updated or patched version of unetbootin
in Lucid repositories, so people do not need to use th
This bug was fixed in the package unetbootin - 471-1ubuntu1
---
unetbootin (471-1ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low
* Fixes issues when loading Ubuntu 10.10 desktop iso. (LP: #615285)
-- Geza KovacsWed, 29 Sep 2010 14:54:28 -0400
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu)
Status: F
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Thanks for the bug fix. It worked!
I tried the beta version of Ubuntu 10.10 as well as beta of Fedora 14.
Both works like a charm with *490 release.
Merci!
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notificati
This must a critical issue for a majority people trying to install
Ubuntu!
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Luke Faraone (lfaraone)
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug no
** Branch linked: lp:~gezakovacs/ubuntu/maverick/unetbootin/fix-10.10
-desktop-iso-loading
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Fixed released as part of UNetbootin 490
** Changed in: unetbootin
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
This turned out to be due to a bug in the way I located files mentioned
in syslinux include statements. The fix has been committed, and I will
be making a new release shortly. For reference (and/or any patching that
may be desired) the diff is located at:
http://github.com/gkovacs/unetbootin/commi
** Summary changed:
- Newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3) unable to boot using Universal Netboot
Installer
+ Cannot boot newer kernels (Ubuntu 10.10 alpha3): "No init found"
** Changed in: unetbootin
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: unetbootin
Status: Incomplete => Confirm
27 matches
Mail list logo
