> On my last install with just thin
> clients the terminal would bring up c...@ltsp21.
That would be a very big problem. If you ever see that again, file a
bug. The correct for thin clients is c...@ltsp-server.
--
LTSP_FATCLIENT=False sends thin-clients into root directory
https://bugs.launchpad
I'm sorry I guess I was just confused. On my last install with just thin
clients the terminal would bring up c...@ltsp21. When I opened a terminal
and saw c...@ltsp-server bells and whistles went off in my head. Please
forgive my ignorance. I am still learning. Thank you for taking the time to
expl
That's normal behavior, why do you think there's a mistake?
The thin client terminal runs on the server, c...@ltsp-server.
The fat client terminal with LTSP_FATCLIENT=true runs on the client,
c...@ltsp21.
And if you start the fat client with LTSP_FATCLIENT=false, you'll again see
c...@ltsp-serve
I think I may have made a mistake somewhere along the line to cause this. Am
going to delete both chroots and ltsp-build-client again and see if the
problem fixes.
** Attachment added: "thinclient.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53316265/thinclient.png
** Attachment added: "fatclient.png"
> I guess what I mean is that if I install the default ltsp-standalone-server
> the thin-clients boot into /opt/ltsp/i386. When I opened a terminal in a
> client I was in the chroot
No, that's not the case. If you open a terminal in a default
installation, you're on the server. So I guess that's w
I guess what I mean is that if I install the default ltsp-standalone-server
the thin-clients boot into /opt/ltsp/i386. When I opened a terminal in a
client I was in the chroot. When I made opt/ltsp/i386 a chroot for
fat-clients and then try to do LTSP_FATCLIENT=False then those computers now
boot i
(I meant it's specific to Ubuntu).
Thin clients boot from a server chroot.
Then, when the user logs in, they connect to the server, and all the session is
on the server.
So they use the server root, because all the user processes run on the server.
If you don't want them to use the server root,
The fat client implementation for now is specific to LTSP, so bugs for
it shouldn't be filed against the LTSP upstream package, but against
ltsp (ubuntu) instead.
** Also affects: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ltsp
Status: New => Invalid
--
LTSP
