Re: [Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2012-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:04:34AM -, Gerald Villemure wrote: > If the original mountall generates UPSTART events, then I supposed it is > possible to trigger a post-mount script that way. It certainly does and always has - there are 'mounting' and 'mounted' events for each filesystem mount, w

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2012-05-19 Thread Gerald Villemure
The point of the mountall2 script was to introduce the idea of a more intelligent booting process, with pre and post mount hooks and the ability to check the progress of the FSCK remotely. I shied away from using the nobootwait option because I needed a postmount script to restart some services on

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2012-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
This bug report seems to have been based on a lack of understanding of the available mountall options. The only filesystems that will block the start of services like ssh are those mounted at standard FHS mount points. If you have a filesystem mounted at one of the standard mount points and you d

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2012-01-05 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
The attachment "mountall2.tar.gz" of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag 'patch' fr

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2011-08-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614662 Title: A better mountall To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2010-10-29 Thread Gerald Villemure
** Attachment removed: "A working work-around" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/614662/+attachment/1480113/+files/mountall2.tar.gz -- A better mountall https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2010-09-14 Thread Fionn
See also: bug #638228 -- A better mountall https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2010-08-21 Thread Ofer Chen
Thank you, I was looking for something that doesn't need constant attention ;) -- A better mountall https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2010-08-18 Thread Erik Reuter
Very nice! Since Scott Remnant has not been responding to bugs with mountall (eg. Bug #571444) I hope that your solution is used in a future Ubuntu release. -- A better mountall https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2010-08-10 Thread Gerald Villemure
Here is an updated version of mountall2 which does a better job of respecting mount hierarchies. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mountall The current implementation of mountall in Lucid is rather dangerous if you don't have console access. It will effectively hang your

[Bug 614662] Re: A better mountall

2010-08-06 Thread Gerald Villemure
** Attachment added: "A working work-around" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53212583/mountall2.tar.gz -- A better mountall https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing