technically, a Makefile is not a header, and also it it not exported
into the includes/ directory, which is what is packjaedf up as a headers
package. What was the underlying problem you were trying to solve?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug effects me.
I make-kpkged my kernel in Ubuntu11.10 and installed in Ubuntu 12.04LTS, tried
to compile Virtualbox Kernel modules but it find no /arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Unfortunatelly both changelog entries do not point to this bug
Otherwise there would have been a (Closes: #57213) as well
--
Not all header files packed into .deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57213
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug con
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: kern
Hi Paul,
unfortunately I only have dapper installations which I won't upgrade due to
service contracts for LTS
I was able to build binary drbd0.7 modules on the host where I was compiling
the original kernel-image and distributed it to my other machines.
So therefor for me it's no longer an issu
This is a bit too technical for me to evaluate.
In the changelog I see:
kernel-package (10.049ubuntu5) edgy; urgency=low
* Detect UTS_RELEASE_HEADER for 2.6.18 allows users to compile
the 2.6.18 kernel.
kernel-package (11.001) unstable; urgency=low
* Bug fix: "kernel-package: make-kpkg debi
