[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2012-06-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: linux Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 Title: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2011-10-24 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 Title: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 To manage notifications about t

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2011-02-11 Thread Andy Whitcroft
@Salvatore -- you indicated that the 14th april CD booted ok. That would have been prior to the Lucid release I believe. Could you confirm which version this was fixed for you, was Lucid or Maverick good for you? Please report back here. Thanks. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Tri

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2011-02-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: linux Importance: Unknown => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 Title: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2011-01-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: linux Status: Unknown => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 Title: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@l

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-07-21 Thread Florian Tobias Schandinat
This does not sound like the issue discussed here. As far as I understand Ubuntu blacklisted viafb and therefore no issues you currently experience can be related to it. Your issue sounds like you can at least figure out where characters are. It would be interesting whether anything is shown correc

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-07-19 Thread Youssef Eldakar
I, too, am experiencing trouble with Ubuntu 10.04 with a 2.6.32-21 -generic-based installer on: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 [Apollo CLE266] integrated CastleRock graphics (rev 03) I am doing a text mode netboot install and not setting up X. The installer is un

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-28 Thread Leo
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #15870 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15870 ** Changed in: linux Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: linux Status: Confirmed => Unknown ** Changed in: linux Remote watch: None => Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #15870 -

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-23 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) => (unassigned) -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-16 Thread kajo
This problem remain.. I tryed install latest (16.4.) alternate ubuntu 10.04 (http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/current/lucid- alternate-i386.iso), but not success. First screen after booting install CD is OK, next (Install Ubuntu) is blank screen and no activity.. -- Unable start as live cd Lucid B

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-15 Thread Salvatore Palma
I tested 15 April's ISO with following md5: 84a36ba155718d24646eaf2a2f7b11d5 and it worked! I confirm the bug is fixed. Thanks for making ubuntu everyday better. -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-15 Thread Irihapeti
I've tested the ISO image of 14 April, and I'm pleased to say that it boots successfully. -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-15 Thread Leo
I upgraded my Beta install, removed the blacklisting that I had created manually and I confirm it boots fine. I will confirm later on that it also works for the ISO daily build. @Steve: Of course. I added the package and upstream project, together with the assigned-to when I marked my own bug a du

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-14 Thread Nicolas
I have the same problem in my HP notebook... -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Given that this fb is (and is meant to be) blacklisted by default, I don't think a kernel fix for this video driver is urgent for lucid. If and when it gets fixed in maverick, the fix can be considered for lucid. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- Una

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-14 Thread Florian Tobias Schandinat
Leo adding vmalloc=268435456 to the line with "quite splash" was what I wanted, thanks. But your syslog missed any reference to viafb even the startup message (probably it didn't get written to disk prior to freeze) so I didn't see anything in there. Anyway by using the fact that - the very same

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-14 Thread Leo
** Description changed: - Hi, - I tried to launch the latest daily build of Ubuntu Lucid beta 2 on my pc: - d5c257bb85664afc97d62b04a5994f02 *lucid-desktop-i386.iso (06-Apr-2010 21:23) + Loading kernel viafb makes the computer completely freeze: - but after a few moments since, these lines

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-14 Thread Leo
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => In Progress ** Also affects: linux Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package module-init-tools - 3.11.1-2ubuntu1 --- module-init-tools (3.11.1-2ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * Blacklist viafb; the only framebuffer drivers we want loaded by default on x86 are the drm framebuffers and vga16fb. LP: #558569. -- Steve Langase

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/module-init-tools -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Oh, huh. Salvatore's lshw.txt appears to also include a card which matches the viafb framebuffer - which, indeed, is not one we want to have loaded. I'll get this fixed in module-init-tools. (BTW, Salvatore, the output of 'lspci -nn' is a lot more parseable than lshw; in the future it would help

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-13 Thread Irihapeti
I'm able to boot with 2.6.32-20 by adding "blacklist viafb" to blacklist.conf -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Ok, so we get as far as mountall running, apparently to completion; but the last events handled appear to be 'mounting' events, when we should see both 'mounted' events following this as well as the 'filesystem' events that will trigger starting gdm, the gettys, and a variety of other services. As

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-11 Thread Irihapeti
@Steve Langasek I'm following this bug because it seems to be very similar to (if not a duplicate of) bug 499399 which has affected me for several months. I don't want to clutter up this report with extraneous attachments, so I have posted the output of the kernel line with --verbose to bug 49939

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-11 Thread Salvatore Palma
This is the output: init: plymounth-log state changed from running to stopping init: rsyslog main process (1132) became new process (1139) init: rsyslog state changed from spawnet to post-start init: rsyslog state changed from post-start to running init: udev state changed from starting to pre

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
This is with --verbose? I would expect to see upstart output here if the argument was being parsed correctly. -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-11 Thread Salvatore Palma
This is the output: Begin: grant administrative policykit privileges to default user ... ... Done. Begin: disabling gdm guest session functionality ... ... Done. Begin: set ubiquity favourite for une ... ... Done. Begin: running /scripts/init-bottom ... Done. init: ureadahead-other main proces

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Ok. Please boot without the 'quiet' and 'splash' options, and add '-- verbose' to the boot options instead; if it hangs, please post the output before the hang. -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-11 Thread Salvatore Palma
Steve, Capslock Led is off. Plymouth animation load for a while (the 5 points blink), then animation stops. Both CTRL+ALT+F1 and Alt+SysRq+K don't do anything. -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Salvatore, Ok, but how do you know that it has *crashed*? Do you get a flashing capslock key? Does the plymouth animation crash? Can you switch VTs with Alt+F1 / Alt+F7? Does Alt+SysRq+K have any effect? -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You recei

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-10 Thread Salvatore Palma
@Irihapeti, I had the same problem also with all alpha releases. @Langasek If I boot whit default options, I see plymouth logo and then my system freezes on it, if I boot without "splash" and "quiet" options I see the error lines which I wrote in the report. -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Bet

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Thanks for this report. How do you know that the startup has crashed? Did you boot with the default boot options? (Normally, these ureadahead-other messages - which are non-fatal - would be hidden by the boot splash screen) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- Unable star

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-08 Thread Irihapeti
@Salvatore This looks rather similar to the bug that's affecting me: bug 499399. Similar hardware and the boot process stops at the same point, according to syslog (just after network activation). Therefore, I am interested to know: have you had the same problem with previous ISO images, or only

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-08 Thread Salvatore Palma
** Description changed: Hi, I tried to launch the latest daily build of Ubuntu Lucid beta 2 on my pc: d5c257bb85664afc97d62b04a5994f02 *lucid-desktop-i386.iso (06-Apr-2010 21:23) but after a few moments since, these lines appeared: - init: ureadahead-other main process (1095) termin

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-08 Thread Salvatore Palma
in attach syslog. ** Attachment added: "syslog" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43452034/syslog -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-08 Thread Salvatore Palma
in attach cpuinfo output. ** Attachment added: "cpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43452006/cpuinfo.txt -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-08 Thread Salvatore Palma
in attach bios output. ** Attachment added: "bios.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43451924/bios.txt -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 558569] Re: Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2

2010-04-08 Thread Salvatore Palma
in attach lshw output. ** Attachment added: "lshw.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43451853/lshw.txt -- Unable start as live cd Lucid Beta 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --