*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 530605 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530605
I somehow fail to see the logic behind marking a bug as Invalid when the
issue is in fact confirmed. Not only that, but a user can easily
interpret this sort of action as a slap in the face. Wouldn't marking i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 530605 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530605
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been
reported, but feel free to report any other bugs you find.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** This bug ha
Top reports 57% CPU usage:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
12977 meracine 20 0 24088 4808 3880 S 57.0 0.2 0:10.88 gvfsd-smb
--
samba browsing fails
https://bugs.launchpa
thank you for your bug report, is gvfsd-smb using cpu when getting the
issue?
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
samba browsing fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546468
You received this bug n
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41882160/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "usr_lib_nautilus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41882161/usr_lib_nautilus.txt
--
samba browsing fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546468
You received this bug noti
