Please see https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7104 for the
details. Upstream has declared these options incompatible and that's how
they fixed that security issue.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
faulty symlinks on mounted samba volumes
https://bugs.l
I checked, You're right. It confused me that this have been changed just like
that in the next version (for me) .
But the question is still there: Why can't unix extension and wide links work
together?
I know it a security hole, but I really need this option one way or another.
--
faulty symli
My understanding is that the link on md1 is a filesystem-local link,
while links to md0 and md2 are wide links, which now get automatically
disabled if unix extensions is on. That would explain why everything
gets fixed when you disable unix extensions.
If I'm right, then this is not a bug. If you
I don't get it what example you're exactly expecting but here is the full story:
I have 4 software raid arrays of 2 hard drives. (So md0 is the system's, md1
and md2 are storages, and md3 is for a kvm guest.)
Symlinks already existed and newly created work properly on md1, only inside
the partiti
@Lightning:
Could you post an example of a symlink that fails with the smb.conf you
attached ?
--
faulty symlinks on mounted samba volumes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542005
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
faulty symlinks on mounted samba volumes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542005
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Of course, even more:
smb.conf: http://pastebin.com/96W66mun
Versions:
libpam-smbpass 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
libsmbclient 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
libwbclient0 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
samba-common-bin 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
samba-doc 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
smbclie
Could you provide the information asked at comment 1.
In particular, how do you access the share ? I suspect it's not using
smbclient but using a CIFS mount, could you confirm, and provide the
options used in that mount ?
I tried accessing a share with symlinks with smbclient and it seems to work
In my case "wide links" is disabled ever since I use Samba. The ordinary
symlink doesn't work if "unix extension" is enabled at the same time. By
doesn't work I mean they don't have any file permissions or even details
just '?' marks instead. It's been working until yesterday...
I'll be more speci
Starting with samba 3.4.6, "wide links" gets disabled automatically if
"unix extensions" are enabled. This is by design to resolve a security
issue.
See:
http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.4.6.html
and
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7104
and
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cv
I've experienced this (or something same) recently too on 9.10 server, Samba
3.4.0.
I'm not sure since when is this lasting but I think upgrading the devicekit-*
package today might caused it.?
That was the last thing I did before noticed this bug...
It only affects symlinks and only on certain
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
faulty symlinks on mounted samba volumes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542005
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
The problem is a copy-paste error from a solution presented in one of
the forums. You want:
wide links = yes
(not wide symlinks)
Russ
--
faulty symlinks on mounted samba volumes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542005
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba#samba-client.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Me
14 matches
Mail list logo
