[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-08-06 Thread George Standish
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-06-24 Thread mstute
A lot of existing scripts assume that dos2unix exists... After having tofrodos installed just create an alias: alias dos2unix="todos -d" and create other missing commands you need (todos -h) -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-06-17 Thread Rafael Laufer
In 10.04 you can install the tofrodos package and use todos apt-get install tofrodos todos -h -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs maili

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-06-10 Thread Anthony Hunter
I am also having this issue and there appears to be no workaround, other than to copy dos2unix from an older Ubuntu? -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-06-06 Thread Matthewgrinnan
I'm also having this problem of command-not-found. -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-05-30 Thread P.Constantine
sudo apt-get install dos2unix Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package dos2unix I don't see how this is a problem of command-not-found -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You rece

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-03-17 Thread Zygmunt Krynicki
0.2.41ubuntu1 has the same data (so it gives the same hints) as 0.2.40ubuntuX. Each issue like that has two possible causes: 1) The scan.data file is out of date and next repo scan performed by Michael Vogt (mvo) will fix this problem 2) The scan.data file is latest but the file is missing becau

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-03-17 Thread Evan Platt
Reproduced in Lucid with the latest PPA version of command-not-found (0.2.41ubuntu1). -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-03-17 Thread Evan Platt
Note that bug 523264 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/command-not- found/+bug/523264) indicates that 'dos2unix' is no longer a part of the 'tofrodos' package, but is rather contained in the new 'dos2unix' package. This appears to be a separate issue from bug 523264, which directs the user to the 'tofro

[Bug 540071] Re: no entry for dos2unix in Lucid

2010-03-17 Thread George Standish
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41102315/Dependencies.txt -- no entry for dos2unix in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs