On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 20:10 +, Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 07:54:31PM -, Ben Collins wrote:
> > The gist of this is, if you are trying to access files like config.h,
> > autoconf.h and compiler.h, you are getting into kernel internals. The
> > linux-libc-dev package (forme
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 07:54:31PM -, Ben Collins wrote:
> The gist of this is, if you are trying to access files like config.h,
> autoconf.h and compiler.h, you are getting into kernel internals. The
> linux-libc-dev package (formerely linux-kernel-headers) is not meant for
> that. Even if the
The gist of this is, if you are trying to access files like config.h,
autoconf.h and compiler.h, you are getting into kernel internals. The
linux-libc-dev package (formerely linux-kernel-headers) is not meant for
that. Even if these files were included they would be useless, since
they do not guara
Ben Collins suggests to install linux-headers-2.6.17- package.
--
Header files missing
https://launchpad.net/bugs/53892
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: linux-kernel-headers (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
--
Header files missing
https://launchpad.net/bugs/53892
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
