[Bug 53415] Re: Small sized updates should so units on size

2006-07-20 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
I don't mind what is used so long as there are some units at the end. When it 1956 I am left wondering "1956 of what? Elephants?" -- Small sized updates should show units on size https://launchpad.net/bugs/53415 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma

[Bug 53415] Re: Small sized updates should so units on size

2006-07-20 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
(could someone change the importance of this to wishlist?) ** Summary changed: - Small sized updates should so units on size + Small sized updates should show units on size -- Small sized updates should show units on size https://launchpad.net/bugs/53415 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 53415] Re: Small sized updates should so units on size

2006-07-19 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Why add bytes only for small sizes? This doesn't make sense. k = 1024 and M = 1024 k. Perhaps we should use mega bytes for all updates. So it would be easier for the user to compare them and less confusing. -- Small sized updates should so units on size https://launchpad.net/bugs/53415 -- ubunt