I have created a new bug, based on my experiences and the comments from
Luca Clementi and Andrey:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pstack/+bug/1609419
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I am also the same problem described by Andrey (iloveeclipse).
# cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS \n \l
Shouldn't this bug be marked as open?
Luca
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Le lundi 17 octobre 2011 23:24:55, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> could somebody please describe how one can build the related packages
> (I'm running 11.04 64 bit)?
>
> I've tried to use the code from here:
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pstack/1.3.1-1 After building the
> binary package wi
Hi,
could somebody please describe how one can build the related packages
(I'm running 11.04 64 bit)?
I've tried to use the code from here:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pstack/1.3.1-1
After building the binary package with "fakeroot debian/rules binary" I have a
pstack executable which
This bug was fixed in the package pstack - 1.3.1-1
---
pstack (1.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
+ Drop all patches.
+ Add support for armel architecture.
* debian/copyright:
+ Add missing hyphen in license statement: "GPL2+" -> "GPL-2+".
+ Give
** Also affects: pstack (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: pstack (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532000
Tit
** Branch linked: lp:debian/pstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532000
Title:
no pstack for amd64
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s
The bug has been fixed in Debian :
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pstack/news/20110910T221737Z.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532000
Title:
no pstack for amd64
To manage notifi
** Changed in: pstack (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532000
Title:
no pstack for amd64
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
@steven: close! i was actually calling gstack.sh directly with bash. my
bad.
I didn't see anyone mention that they were getting null output. Had I
seen that, I could've reacted quicker.
In any case, I'll go ahead and re-do the patch and post updated
instructions on patching 10.04/10.10.
Thanks.
The patch is s close but not quite there.
As it turns out, the standard Ubuntu install has this symlink
/bin/sh -> /bin/dash
This breaks the gstack.sh script since of course all good gnu developers
assume that
/bin/sh is linked to /bin/bash.
So
The patch needs to be modified so that th
Hi,
I'm new in Ubuntu, so sorry for this probably silly question - to which
release the fix goes into?
Is it planned to include it into the 10.04 or 10.10, or how one can find
it out - are there any tags/plans/rules etc?
In case it does NOT get into 10.04, could somebody please describe how
one
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532000
Title:
no pstack for amd64
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
I've ported the gstack script from RedHat. This essentially replicates
the functionality of pstack (which is i386 dependent) on non-i386
platforms (like amd64).
** Patch added: "gdb.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pstack/+bug/532000/+attachment/114/+files/gdb.debdiff
--
Hey Alex, Were you attempting to run pstack on x86_64/amd64 or i386?
I've had similar problems on x86_64/amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532000
Title:
no pstack for amd64
--
u
** Tags added: amd64
--
no pstack for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532000
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
Hi Michael,
Yes, I tried sudo; also tried using backticks (`pgrep cron`) and using
the pid. Here's what happened:
sudo pstack `pgrep cron`
Usage: pstack
sudo pstack 1879
$
Was there anything else you did (aside from convert and install pstack
from and use cpio to unpack gdb)? For the record,
Very basic question: did you try sudo?
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS"
$ pstack `pgrep cron`
$ sudo pstack `pgrep cron`
#0 0x7f5350307370 in nanosleep () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x7f5350307200
Following the information outlined in the post by Michael Blakeley, I
unpacked gdb (tried the version you referenced in your post and the
latest on rpm.pbone.net) but in both cases executing gstack does what
Martin described (output is blank).
Anyone had any luck getting this to work with Ubuntu 1
It's been a little while, but I believe I extracted gstack from the rpm
without installing it. You'll need rpm2cpio and cpio for this.
$ rpm2cpio gdb-6.3.0.0-1.132.EL4.x86_64.rpm | cpio -idmv
./usr/bin/gcore
./usr/bin/gdb
./usr/bin/gdbserver
./usr/bin/gdbtui
./usr/bin/gstack
./usr/share/doc/gdb-6
I've been looking for an official pstack release for x64_86 for a long
time so this addition would be very welcome.
Could you please explain the work around in a little more detail? I can't get
success with 10.04.
I've converted and installed
/pub/centos/5.4/os/x86_64/CentOS/pstack-1.2-7.2.2.x86
21 matches
Mail list logo
