On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 07:09 +, Phlogistique wrote:
> Of course.
>
> But a Ubuntu user must have the freedom to remove the non-free material
> easily. The problem is not it's included, the problem is it's included
> in the kernel package so user can't remove it unless by recompiling
> linux.
e
Of course.
But a Ubuntu user must have the freedom to remove the non-free material
easily. The problem is not it's included, the problem is it's included
in the kernel package so user can't remove it unless by recompiling
linux.
And splitting linux-image in a free-as-in-freedom part and a free-as
> The Ubuntu policy is clear and not clear at same time.
>From http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/licensing
Documentation, Firmware, and Drivers
Ubuntu contains licensed and copyrighted works that are not application
software. For example, the default Ubuntu installation includes
documentation, images
The Ubuntu policy is clear and not clear at same time.
On one part it says it's free opensource, on the other, it may contain
non free components.
There are several talks about the subject, on at least 2 french Ubuntu
communities, and on the english mailing list ubuntu-users. Some people
thought
See Ubuntu policy - this is on purpose and not a bug.
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Rejected
--
Proprietary Firmware in default Linux-image-xxx
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52953
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Proprietary Firmware in default Linux-image-xxx
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52953
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
