[Bug 522099] Re: symlinks on ecryptfs cause spurious modifications

2010-10-30 Thread Fabrizio Balliano
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 567945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567945 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 524919 ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 567945 problems whit uck pakage manager * You can subscr

[Bug 522099] Re: symlinks on ecryptfs cause spurious modifications

2010-03-17 Thread tonfa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524919 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 Bug was closed upstream, http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2042 Best would be if ecryptfs was fixed. ** Bug watch added: Mercurial Bug Tracker #2042 http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2042 ** This

Re: [Bug 522099] Re: symlinks on ecryptfs cause spurious modifications

2010-02-15 Thread avdd
It seems I can't do that without creating an account, hence my report here. I though that was the point of launchpad. Quoth tonfa (2010-02-15 23:18): > I guess we could skip the size check if it's a symlink. Could you open a > bug in upstream's bugtracker ? (mercurial.selenic.com/bts) > > -- >

[Bug 522099] Re: symlinks on ecryptfs cause spurious modifications

2010-02-15 Thread tonfa
I guess we could skip the size check if it's a symlink. Could you open a bug in upstream's bugtracker ? (mercurial.selenic.com/bts) -- symlinks on ecryptfs cause spurious modifications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 522099] Re: symlinks on ecryptfs cause spurious modifications

2010-02-15 Thread avdd
git also has the same problem, svn and bzr do not -- symlinks on ecryptfs cause spurious modifications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.