For the record, I think Canonical has a very sophisticated view of the
free software model. We directly fund a huge amount of free software
development, through Ubuntu, Bazaar, Storm and other projects. The vast
majority of the code we work on and publish is published under the GPL.
So we know
I think that Canonical is doing a fine job with free software, and they
have the stated intent of opening Launchpad at a certain point in the
development of their business plan. If they don't, then I'll start
hounding them to open it. But until then, they've already expressed
their intent, and th
Hi Przemyslaw,
This is not a matter of distribution. Launchpad should be free software
in order to receive multiple colaboration on its development, bugfixing
and feature implementation. The reason is, anyone who used free
software, strongly belive that a community building a software is much
more
