*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 810606 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810606
It is still slow in Ubuntu 12.04. Using smbclient is 3-times faster than
using Nautilus!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 810606 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810606
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 471512
Slow cifs ubuntu 9.10
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 810606
Slow cifs in 11.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 471512 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471512
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 471512
Slow cifs ubuntu 9.10
* You can subscribe to bug 471512 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/471512/+subscribe
I can confirm.
Nautilus speed ~6MB/sec,
cifs mount (via fstab) speed is limited to 2MB/sec.
Same remote share.
Why is that? Please fix!!
--
Poor performance for mounted SMB (windows) shares.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504737
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
I am encounter the same problem with the Ubuntu Lucid desktop accessing
Ubuntu Lucid server with samba share. When i connect the samba share
with Nautilus the file transfer achieve 40MB/s but when mount samba
share with autofs, the file transfer speed only 9 MB/s and when mount
with fstab, the file
I am encountering the same problem with the Marvell 88E8056 controller
in 10.04. Transfer rate is 50MB/sec with Nautilus but only 25MB/sec
using cp and mount -t cifs.
--
Poor performance for mounted SMB (windows) shares.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504737
You received this bug notification b
Tested it in Kubuntu also. Same behavior. The samba/cifs are slower than
sftp even. There must be something wrong with the smb/cifs... Or it
might be related to wifi and 802.11n nm reporting 0 kbps (is actually
160M).
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Poor performa
Works fast with gvfs / libsmbclient and slow with kernel/cifs,
reassigning to kernel.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
Poor performance for mounted SMB (windows) shares.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504737
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
** Package changed: ubuntu => samba (Ubuntu)
--
Poor performance for mounted SMB (windows) shares.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504737
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
As comparsion. a plain installed XP64 gives 50MB/s, while Win7 gives 100MB/s !
yes, it's 1Gbit network, and the numbers are actual calculated speed by copying
2GB while using stopwatch.
I assume the big difference is due to different driver, but the one in Linux is
hard to excuse..
The controlle
10 matches
Mail list logo
