[Bug 50232] Re: build-essential has missleading description

2008-09-02 Thread Lorenzo J. Lucchini
Unless build-essential is not suited to obtain a usable development environment, I don't see why it can't "double" as both "a package defined by Debian policy" and a handy metapackage to be suggested for obtaining a development environment. -- build-essential has missleading description https://b

[Bug 50232] Re: [Bug 50232] Re: build-essential has missleading description

2006-07-02 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
> If we want a "install this to have a development environment" package, > we should make one and called it "ubuntu-devel" or something. I (repeatedly) suggested that, but it was always discarded as unneccessary... -- build-essential has missleading description https://launchpad.net/bugs/50232

[Bug 50232] Re: build-essential has missleading description

2006-06-19 Thread Scott James Remnant
That's not what build-essential is for though. If we want a "install this to have a development environment" package, we should make one and called it "ubuntu-devel" or something. build-essential is a package defined by Debian Policy ** Changed in: build-essential (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfi