** Also affects: brz-debian
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: brz-debian
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: brz-debian
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 07:26:41 pm you wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:25:06 -, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > Currently to pass the equivalent of dpkg-buildpackakge -S -sa -us -uc one
> > would use -S -- -sa -us -uc.
>
> Just to be clear, you are actually free to spell this
>
> bzr b
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:25:06 -, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> Currently to pass the equivalent of dpkg-buildpackakge -S -sa -us -uc one
> would use -S -- -sa -us -uc.
Just to be clear, you are actually free to spell this
bzr bd -- -S -sa -us -uc
if you like.
Thanks,
James
--
You received
Currently to pass the equivalent of dpkg-buildpackakge -S -sa -us -uc one
would use -S -- -sa -us -uc. This could stand being de-uglified. I think
"You are talking to bzr-builddeb before the -- and dpkg-buildpackage after"
would at least be more consistent. Personally, I think the reverse mak
the bzr infrastructure doesn't have a way to pass them down. Other than
using '-- -f -b -x' and treating them all as non Option arguments
Depends which is more tasteful. Explicitly listing them, or using -- to
denote them as being directly passed down.
--
You received this bug notification becau
Is it possible to request bzr to not choke on unknown options and just
pass them through as a list?
That would be a quicker way to solve this, but I don't like the
interface that would provide. I think we are stuck with just adding all
the arcane options to bzr-builddeb.
Thanks,
James
--
You r
Agreed that fixing the warts is the long-term goal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499684
Title:
Interface to dpkg-buildpackage inconsistent and not well documented
--
ubuntu-bugs m
If possible I'd prefer an improved interface to better documentation of
the existing warts.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499684
Title:
Interface to dpkg-buildpackage inconsistent an
I will document this in my sphinx doc branch
** Changed in: bzr-builddeb
Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry)
** Changed in: bzr-builddeb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
** Also affects: bzr-builddeb
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: bzr-builddeb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: bzr-builddeb (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: bzr-builddeb
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: bzr-build
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37109380/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37109381/XsessionErrors.txt
--
Interface to dpkg-buildpackage inconsistent and not well documented
https://bugs.launchpad
11 matches
Mail list logo
