[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2013-05-18 Thread dino99
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2012-11-19 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest v3.7 kernel[0] (Not a kernel in the daily directory) and install both the linux-image and linux-image-extra .deb packages. If this bug is fixed in the ma

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2012-11-19 Thread Joseph Salisbury
This bug was filed against a series that is no longer supported and so is being marked as Won't Fix. If this issue still exists in a supported series, please file a new bug. This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2012-11-16 Thread Steve Langasek
This remains a serious bug in the NFS implementation in Linux, that has persisted into the current releases. Reopening. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2012-11-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury
This bug was filed against a series that is no longer supported and so is being marked as Won't Fix. If this issue still exists in a supported series, please file a new bug. This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2012-09-27 Thread Harry Flink
I'm not an NFS/Bazaar developer so I'm not familiar with the details but this bug is pretty serious in every day use when using NFS shares. User "gpk" above mentioned this has something to do with sent write/locking requests. Could it be possible to have an easy workaround to this bug like modifyi

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-10-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480444 Title:

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-10-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480444 Title: p

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-09-29 Thread Kate Stewart
** Tags added: rls-mgr-o-tracking -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480444 Title: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate() To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-09-26 Thread Tim Gardner
** Also affects: bzr (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bzr (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) Impor

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-07-19 Thread Brad Figg
Ignore my last comment, sigh. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480444 Title: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-07-19 Thread Brad Figg
There was a bug in the bot that marked the bug watch task "Won't Fix". That has been addressed. I apologize for any inconvenience. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480444 Title: packet

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-07-18 Thread Robert Collins
Reopening per slangaseks comment. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480444 Title: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-07-18 Thread Brad Figg
This bug was filed against a series that is no longer supported and so is being marked as Won't Fix. If this issue still exists in a supported series, please file a new bug. This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-07-14 Thread Steve Langasek
This bug is still present in every release since karmic, up to and including oneiric's 3.0 kernel. ** Tags removed: karmic ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-07-14 Thread Brad Figg
This bug was filed against a series that is no longer supported and so is being marked as Won't Fix. If this issue still exists in a supported series, please file a new bug. This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-31 Thread Steve Langasek
it's still reproducible for me with a 2.6.38 client and the current version of nfs-common in natty, which is 1.2.2. I am not at liberty to upgrade the server (and this is a bug with a misbehaving client, in any case). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-30 Thread Pierre-Louis Bonicoli
After updating some packages, i can not reproduce: - server & client: nfs-common 1.2.3-1, linux-image-2.6.38-1 - server: nfs-kernel-server 1.2.3, libgssglue 0.1-4 - client: libgssglue 0.2-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-21 Thread Pierre-Louis Bonicoli
Using bzr + nfsv4 i reproduce systematically ("bzr status" command non-interruptible even with kill -9. Using "umount -f " once or twice terminates bzr command). I add log statements (logs added with 'mutter' are stored in ~/.bzr.log) in "show_tree_status" from status.py. It appears that thi

Re: [Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-15 Thread gpk
The only way I can think of would be by taking some kind of memory image via the kernel. Unless you know a way, I think you'd best be happy with the strace output. On 15/03/11 01:13, Robert Collins wrote: > can you get a core perhaps? > -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

Re: [Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-14 Thread Robert Collins
can you get a core perhaps? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480444 Title: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

Re: [Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-14 Thread gpk
Can't do that. It's non-interruptible even with kill -9. There is output from strace at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665082 On 14/03/11 21:42, Martin Pool wrote: > To help us work out whether a workaround in bzr is possible, can someone > please interrupt bzr at the point where this is happ

Re: [Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:42:02PM -, Martin Pool wrote: > To help us work out whether a workaround in bzr is possible, can someone > please interrupt bzr at the point where this is happening, and post the > Python traceback that should be written into ~/.bzr.log. No, the process is uninterrup

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-14 Thread Martin Pool
To help us work out whether a workaround in bzr is possible, can someone please interrupt bzr at the point where this is happening, and post the Python traceback that should be written into ~/.bzr.log. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2011-03-14 Thread Harry Flink
I think we may have experienced the same bug as noted here because syslog shows sys_ftruncate(). I already posted a bug report here so this is a crosspost but I think this could more proper bug report for our issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/578866/comments/4 I try to

Re: [Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2010-10-23 Thread gpk
On 24/10/10 00:32, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:42:27PM -, gpk wrote: >> I looked at the packet storm (captured above), and it seems to be a rapid >> repetition of a single >> command and a single response. >> The command is a COMPOUND of PUTFH, WRITE, GETATTR, >> and th

Re: [Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2010-10-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:42:27PM -, gpk wrote: > I looked at the packet storm (captured above), and it seems to be a rapid > repetition of a single > command and a single response. > The command is a COMPOUND of PUTFH, WRITE, GETATTR, > and the server responds with NFS4ERR_OPENMODE which is

[Bug 480444] Re: packet storm with linux NFSv4 client when calling ftruncate()

2010-10-23 Thread gpk
I looked at the packet storm (captured above), and it seems to be a rapid repetition of a single command and a single response. The command is a COMPOUND of PUTFH, WRITE, GETATTR, and the server responds with NFS4ERR_OPENMODE which is in response to a failure of the WRITE. Now, it is odd that the