[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2010-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/mountall -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-11-10 Thread Dustin Kirkland
I took a crack at adding a -f fake-mount option to mount.ecryptfs.c today. I'm attaching the not-yet-functional diff, simply to store it off somewhere until I have time to come back and take another look at it. The argument parsing still needs some work. ** Attachment added: "out" http://laun

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-11-10 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) => (unassigned) ** Also affects: ecryptfs Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ecryptfs

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-11-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/mountall -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-25 Thread Scott James Remnant
This bug has been fixed. If you are still having problems, please file a new report. ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New => Fix Released -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-24 Thread Rajeev
No whoop i face similar problem as you, I have attached my o/p or log to the command "mountall --debug > mountall0.2.5.log 2>&1" in #73. I think it might help kernel ppl get a better idea. -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-24 Thread whoop
Are you referring to me Rajeev? If so, I attached the log in comment #71 -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-23 Thread Rajeev
again there seems to be some problem. Please find the o/p to: sudo mountall --debug > mountall0.2.5.log 2>&1 ** Attachment added: "mountall0.2.5.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34302392/mountall0.2.5.log -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-23 Thread Rajeev
Thanks for the info Dustin, with new kernel upgrade. Everythings seems so good so far.. -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-21 Thread whoop
** Attachment added: "sudo mountall --debug > mountall0.2.5.log 2>&1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34115849/mountall0.2.5.log -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

Re: [Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-21 Thread Hamish Downer
whoop: might be good to do about $ sudo mountall --debug > mountall0.2.5.log 2>&1 and then attach the resultant file to the bug again -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-21 Thread whoop
I still get stuck at boot. This happens about once every ten boots (on average). It gets stuck right after fsck now.. It just sits there, with a blinking cursor and no hd activity Please let me know if there is any (more) information I can provide to solve this problem... I am using mountall

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-21 Thread whoop
I still get stuck at boot. This happens about once every ten boots (on average). It gets stuck right after fsck now.. It just sits there, with a blinking cursor and no hd activity Please let me know if there is any (more) information I can provide to solve this problem... I am using mountall

Re: [Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-20 Thread Dustin Kirkland
fsck is disabled when you're on battery power, for your protection (so that the battery doesn't die during the middle of an fsck recovery, which would be *very* bad). :-Dustin -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-20 Thread Rajeev
not sure if it helps, but a little trial error indicated: Case 1: Turn on my laptop without the power cord connected. No fsck error. Case 2: Turn on the laptop with power cord connected. fsck from util-linux-ng 2.16 /dev/sda5 has been mounted 34 times without being checked, check forced A litt

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mountall - 0.2.5 --- mountall (0.2.5) karmic; urgency=low * Filesystem check progress reporting, including cancellation. LP: 446596. * When we're waiting for a mountpoint, if a few seconds of inactivity passes, report what we're waiting for a

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-19 Thread Rajeev
wow. for some mysterious reason when i tried to boot my trouble systemit went through. Can someone throw some light on this? Also, I'm a little afraid of getting updates and installing new packages now :) -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4430

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-18 Thread Scott James Remnant
I've uploaded a new version of mountall (0.2.5) to the ubuntu-boot PPA, as usual I would appreciate a little testing before I upload it to the archive proper. Thanks -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-17 Thread Rajeev
oops actually i did sudo apt-get upgrade ! instead of sudo apt-get update that i mentioned in the last post. this took a while, since it was upgrading all kind of packages. -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-17 Thread Rajeev
Checked source.list.d files and source.list file that you specified. I dont think I have http://ppa... or anything link with word boot enabled. But, still your solution worked once and then, I tried to boot in safe mode and repaired the packages. Again, I'm at the same point. unable to boot :( Nex

Re: [Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-17 Thread Ernst
Well, my solution is applicable if you enabled the boot ppa. Those apckages are sometimes quite experimental. In that case, you can downgrade the boot ppa packages to the 'stable' ones from the standard karmic repo. If that's the case, you first have to disable the boot ppa. You can edit this by t

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-16 Thread Rajeev
My system was restored and I was running Karmic for a week. Now, the same problem arises. I again tried to follow your steps (below). Can you please tell me what should be removed or what causes the problem that should be removed when I'm in the problematic install (mount from disk - Solution menti

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Please close out (--> "wontfix") karmic targets for bugs that are being deferred to lucid, don't just remove the milestone. ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-14 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Since Scott has worked around this, I won't try to fix this for Karmic. However, I'll handle it in the upstream source and merge that into Lucid. Dropping the milestone, leaving assigned to me. :-Dustin ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: ubuntu-9.10 => None ** Changed

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/karmic/mountall/ubuntu -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-14 Thread Scott James Remnant
Have worked around this in mountall ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: None => ubuntu-9.10 -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-14 Thread Scott James Remnant
Dustin: in the mount manpage: -f Causes everything to be done except for the actual system call; if it's not obvious, this ``fakes'' mounting the file system. This option is useful in conjunction with the -v flag to deter‐ mine what the mou

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-14 Thread Hamish Downer
Dustin, not sure exactly, though comments #48 and #49 might be of some use. At any rate, mountall appears to expect that you won't ask for a password. But I'm no expert, just reading between the lines, so ... I've resubscribed Scott James Remnant, who is responsible for mountall, and hope that he

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-14 Thread EliGonzalez
I also have the same problem and I still looking to fix this bug. fsck from util-Linux-ng 2.16 /dev/sda7 has mounted 37 times without being checked, check forced -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-13 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Where is the specification of -f|--fakemount that ecryptfs is supposed to support? :-Dustin ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New => Incomplete -- ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443080 You received this bug notification

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-13 Thread whoop
I tried it all, user login password, the password for my private folder, an empty password, cancel and the window close button Is the Action value: org.freedesktop.devicekit.disks.filesystem-mount- system-internal in the screenshot(http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33558071/gparted.png) of any use

[Bug 443080] Re: ecryptfs mount does not support -f (fake mount)

2009-10-13 Thread Hamish Downer
OK - I've updated the title and subscribed Dustin Kirkland (who looks after ecryptfs). I guess the status should be triaged, but I don't seem to have permission to change that. I'm also bewildered as to why you are being asked for a password for /dev/sda5 - have you tried just closing that window