Seconded. Please provide a backport to lucid!
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Please can we get this in lucid as a backport since it's an LTS release?
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
This is great news to finally get OpenLdap back working smoothly in
Ubuntu. Cannot wait to plug authentifications back on LDAP without
fearing to break everything with an update. Any chance to get it soon on
Maverick through maverick-backports?
Bigs thanks for this work!
--
openldap install bare
This bug was fixed in the package openldap - 2.4.23-6ubuntu1
---
openldap (2.4.23-6ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable:
- Install a default DIT (LP: #442498).
- Document cn=config in README file (LP: #370784).
- remaining changes:
+ AppArmor su
Yeah, the fact that this isn't even being worked on since this problem
was reported over a year ago is pretty embarrassing. It definitely seems
like critical Ubuntu server issues are largely ignored.
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
After every new release of ubuntu (the last I am trying now is 10.10) I
try openldap. Unfortunately every time I end up with the same result. It
does not work. I type in "dpkg-reconfigure slapd" and the result is the
same as mentioned at the top of this bug report - no password asked
configuration
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Adam Sommer (asommer)
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Can someone change this from wishlist to something more likely to get
fixed?
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
What is the functional state of openldap-dit? (https://launchpad.net
/openldap-dit/)
It hasn't seen any activity since 2009-12-02 and there are no milestones
and no available downloads. The trunk show last modified 20 weeks ago.
Is it functional, or the early stages of work in progress? The form
I'd suggest to have a look at the openldap-dit project on LP:
https://launchpad.net/openldap-dit/
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Just to get a feel for the state here, is there currently any work done
at all for this slapd-dit package?
Why is this marked as "Won't fix"? Is Ubuntu planning a new LTS release
with no LDAP? That'll go over well. Has anyone in canonocal mgmt even
seen this? Or is it a nasty little surprise they'
This is not a documentation problem. It is a completely broken package
problem. After spending ages troubleshooting a migration from a working
LDAP config to a new LDAP instance on Karmic I gave up. I'm going to
install a Windows DC and use likewise. Openldap is now my most hated
piece of softw
Apologies in advance for the useless rant, but whose idea was it to
strip out the default ldap config?
I second the comments of everyone here that laments the time when slapd just
worked.
The cn=config change was difficult to swallow, but in the interest of progress,
OK, fine. This release howe
In my opionion, the new (useless) slapd package should not have shipped
until the accompanying slapd-dit was ready. It basically broke LDAP for
everyone but experts, and now Mathias doesn't have time to fix it.
Mathias, can you make slapd-dit a priority? It's been several months
since a usable s
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:14:20PM -, Tobias Bradtke wrote:
> Is the package "slapd-dit" planed to be included in Lucid?
It probably is too late for Lucid as FeatureFreeze is in effect.
> Or will it at least be in the "OpenLDAP Edgers PPA"?
>
There isn't such a PPA AFAIK. However anyone can
Is the package "slapd-dit" planed to be included in Lucid?
Or will it at least be in the "OpenLDAP Edgers PPA"?
Thanks!
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:50:37PM -, Jürgen Erhard wrote:
> When you removed the DIT code
> from the package, why TF did you not roll a *simple* slapd-dit package
> (or whatever one would have called it)?
That's the plan: creating a slapd-dit package that would provide the same DIT
as before.
And it also won't be fixed in any meaningful way in Lucid, or do I read
that "Declined for Lucid" wrong?
Really, I'm appalled. Last time I saw such a broken-as-installed
package was in an ancient SuSE install. When you removed the DIT code
from the package, why TF did you not roll a *simple* sla
The lack of a simple way of setting up a working basic ldap-service is a
serious problem. I've basically resigned to either using a really old
package that's not broken in this way or just forgetting about ldap in
ubuntu.
What's the reasoning behind upgrading a package from "too old" to
"unusable"
19 matches
Mail list logo
