Re: [Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-06 Thread Mathias Gug
Hi, On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:51:16PM -, Lupe Christoph wrote: > I can tell you that I deinstalled bacula-director-mysql bacula-director- > common bacula-fd bacula-sd bacula-sd-mysql and removed the init scripts. > Dunno why these were not deinstalled. They are considered part of the > config

[Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph
I just realized that because the init scripts are part of the configuration, they will probably not be replaced by an upgrade, so I'm still running init scripts from Intrepid or even earlier. -- Bacula daemons are not started during system boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442125 You received

[Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph
1. Is this reproducible? Yes, it is. 2. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? Be as detailed as possible. Well, this machine has been running Ubuntu and bacula for quite some time, so I can't be really sure that I'm not missing something. I can tell you that I deinstal

[Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Chuck Short
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions: 1. Is this reproducible? 2. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? Be as detailed as possible. This will help us to find and resolve the problem. ** Changed

[Bug 442125] Re: Bacula daemons are not started during system boot

2009-10-04 Thread Lupe Christoph
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32973152/XsessionErrors.txt -- Bacula daemons are not started during system boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub