On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:05:15AM -, Scott Moser wrote:
> > The images should do what is necessary to support both UEC and EC2 very
> > well, until such time as we find that it would be more effective to maintain
> > two separate images.
>
> I read that to indicate that we should have install
> The images should do what is necessary to support both UEC and EC2 very
> well, until such time as we find that it would be more effective to maintain
> two separate images.
I read that to indicate that we should have installed in the image
linux-image-virtual and linux-image-ec2 (or whatever th
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 03:03:49PM -, Scott Moser wrote:
> > Some other options have been discussed like building kernel modules into
> > the kernel or copying them from initrd into /lib/modules at boot time,
> > but the easiest approach to get things working in the short term is
> > probably j
> Some other options have been discussed like building kernel modules into
> the kernel or copying them from initrd into /lib/modules at boot time,
> but the easiest approach to get things working in the short term is
> probably just to follow the existing de facto standard and include the
> kernel
Public bug reported:
It is fairly standard practice to include kernel modules in images for
Amazon EC2, but the most recent Karmic AMIs do not include them:
ami-a40fefcd
canonical-alphas-us/karmic-i386-alpha5.1.manifest.xml
ami-a20fefcb
canonical-alphas-us/karmic-x86_64-alpha5.1.manifest
