Thanks for the info. Imlib2 does not really duplicate functionality of
Imlib1, though. The latter is mostly about loading, rendering and
transforming images while the former is mostly about animations.
I did port KuickShow to Imlib2 once. I even contributed to Imlib2 to make that
possible at all.
Kuickshow is part of kdegraphics and needs imlib. kdegraphics is in
main but imlib is not in main because imlib2 is in main and we don't
allow duplicate code in main where possible. If someone wants to
separate kuickshow from kdegraphics (svn2dist is your friend) and
package that and promise to k
Seriously guys. Every time I reinstall Ubuntu I do some hacking to make
kuickshow work, and I haven't seen any conflicts yet, nor any reason why
it shouldn't be included in the standard distribution.
I like kuickshow much more than the replacements suggested. Please add
it back.
--
Cannot execut
Jonathan,
what's wrong with Imlib? Is it obsolete just because there is an Imlib2?
Imlib2 has a very different scope and is not a replacement for Imlib1,
despite of its naming.
Imlib1 works perfectly, as does kuickshow. No other image viewer can
compete with kuickshow's speed and there are quite
