> but I'm baffled as to why Canonical aren't making a public effort to
repair the credibility damage the presence of this bug and others in a
"release" version has done to them.
Ubuntu is a community project, while Canonical invest ressources to work
on it Ubuntu is not limited to Canonical. The b
** Changed in: samba
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Already fixed in upstream, but no fix for Ubuntu!
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7791
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #7791
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7791
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7791
Importance: Unknown
I agree Amoor; this bug is critical but it is the release of Maverick
with bugs like #160311 that really makes me nervous about the future fit
and finish of the Ubuntu packaged GNOME desktop (to say nothing of the
ghastly state of Unity in 10.10). I accept that re-installing Lucid
would resolve mos
Ubuntu 10.10 is crippled by this bug that prevents network copy.
Everybody who is just trying to use Ubuntu Linux that is not a developer
has no clue what to do. As of Nov 21 2010, with all updates applied I
cannot copy anything via the network to my Windows 2003 server without
getting the "Invalid
Is that bug found in samba4 ?
And anybody built the patched version yet ?
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
where can I get fixed packages for ubuntu 10.10? Any ppa repo maybe? I
really don't wanna compile samba myself :(
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
The Maverick bug has been fixed in the samba code. Turns out the problem
was with libsmbclient.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633937
for more information.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notificat
This is definitely a problem with smbclient. I just downgrade to samba
3.4.7 (from Lucid) and now have no problems copying files to smb shares.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Ben: can you reproduce the problem using the gvfs-copy command line
tool? can you reproduce the problem using KDE's Dolphin?
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Filed with bugzilla.gnome.org
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633937
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #633937
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633937
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug not
Should also mention that I have no problem reading data from the share.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
I have the same problem, but with perhaps a bit more information.
I am able to copy files using nautilus to a samba share hosted on XPsp3 or
earlier. The bug is only present (for me) when copying to a share hosted on
Windows 7 or Server 2008r2. Something to do with the new authentication
requ
As noted in Bug #659854, this time in maverick, the problem appears only
when copying files greater than 48kb. This symptom was never mentioned
in Bug #393012. Could this be a different bug altogether?
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You
This bug has apparently reared its ugly head again in Maverick, as was
discussed in bug #659854 . I've marked it as a duplicate of this bug
which I'm reopening.
To sum up the discussion on bug #659854 - the behavior is almost the
same as the reports on this bug except that fact that the size of th
Commander to transfer files.
Could problem really be Nautilus?
Edward LeBlanc
> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:19:22 +
> From: 393...@bugs.launchpad.net
> To: ka9...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug 393012] Re: smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
>
> ** Chan
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: Fix Released => Unknown
** Changed in: gvfs
Importance: Unknown => High
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Please help,
I have a NAS server (NASLite - SMB). I can use Nautilus 2.22.5.1 in
Ubuntu 8.04 to copy files from my hard drive to the NASLite server.
When I try to do this with the newer Ubuntu 10.04, I get an error
message from Nautilus "Invalid Argument". Funny thing, I can delete
files, and mo
Confirmed in Ubuntu Lucid, beta 2. Autofs still created the /smb folder
with 755 permissions, as root. This means that regardless of your
credentials, you can't write the resulting folder/share.
Putting :
/smb/etc/auto.smbuid=1000,gid=1000,--timeout=300
as your /etc/auto.master still wo
Still problem in Ubuntu 9.10, when I'm tryring to mount manually using
command line, I can write to the shared folder, but when using nautilus,
still cannot write to the shared folder.
I'm using:
Ubuntu 9.10
smbclient/smbfs 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.3
autofs 4.1.4+debian-2.1ubuntu2
and my server is:
Ubun
I can confirm that this is still a problem on karmic. I just did a fresh
install in a VM last night, and the only way I can get proper user/group
perms is to use an old smb script that manually mounts the points with
smbmount, passing the standard options:
-o password=$PASS,username=oubiwann,uid=1
Today I've downloaded new update trough synaptic for smbfs and
smbclient. I can confirm that this bug no more exist on my computer. I
can write to samba share, and autofs is now working like before.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You re
The shutdown bug is being discussed here :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/+bug/211631?comments=all, but there's no fix as yet. The
umountcifs.sh script does still work, but as I say, Network Manager
drops the WIFI connection far, far too early in the shutdown process fo
re the "no response from server" - there is a fix. I don't have the
citation handy but the idea was to dismount network mounts earlier in
the shutdown process. It was a script to add to the shutdown pile that
killed any processes holding on to a share and then dismounted the
share. I think it was d
The workaround in autofs is to add -gid=1000,uid=1000 (e.g.) to the map
in auto.master so the directories created by autofs become owned by user
1000. That allows that user rw access. The problem is that autofs sets
the directories rwx for owner and just r for group and other. I think
autofs should
And is your share read-only? That's the issue I'm experiencing with
autofs. I'd appreciate it if you could confirm this bug if so.
However, I don't think anyone is now tracking this bug. I added the "affects
project" for autofs too late after the relevant gvfs issues were fixed.
Combined wit
I have another problem. Trough AutoFS I'm mounting some directories from
my NAS.
$cat auto.master
/home/coudy/nas//etc/autofs/auto.coudy --ghost --timeout 5
$cat autofs.coudy
Videa;;
-fstype=smbfs,username=coudy,password=***,iocharset=utf8,codepage=iso8859-1
://nas.l
Przemysław Kochański, you've indicated that you've tested this and it
works. Can you post details of what you tested? As previously stated,
I've updated to smbclient 3.4.0-3 (now ubuntu5 as of posting), but all
my smb shares are /still/ mounted read-only by autofs. Should I open
another bug?
St
No change here, using AutoFS to mount my shares - they're all still
read-only unless I run nautilus with sudo.
sca...@groovy:~$ dpkg-query -W smbclient
smbclient 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu1
Latest smbclient appears to be installed and my auto.master simply
mounts the share using smbclient. Is there s
tested and confirmed. fixed in karmic.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: gvfs (Debian)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://b
This issue was fixed upstream and appears to be fixed with the latest
smbclient 3.4.0-3ubuntu1 on karmic.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
You are more then welcome to nudge the developers using GNOME's Bugzilla
:-) , Just make sure that you are polite about it.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I try to avoid adding me-too's, but it is disconcerting to see the lack
of activity / discussion on the upstream report. This is a showstopper
bug for me, and I'm am quite concerned seeing the 2.27 beta gnome stuff
coming shortly. I will gladly provide any debugging information needed
to get this c
I'm the reported of the GNOME bugzilla bug, and the confirmation came
from another person. This should be confirmed in the GNOME bugzilla, but
while some GNOME developers are very responsive to bugzilla reports,
others are not as available. I'll ping Tomas in the bugzilla about this.
--
smb: Erro
I'm not sure what's going on with the upstream bug?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588391 shows (still) as
"unconfirmed". Does anyone with know-how on the Gnome bug tracker know
what's needed to bring this to the attention of the gnome devs?
It seems that Tomas Bzatek, the gvfs dev, as
Sorry, I've completely misunderstood that bug report :P
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Nope, 220434 is about the message being uninformative. This bug is about
what's causing that message.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Hi,
maybe #220434 is a duplicate of this bug?
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
** Changed in: gvfs (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #536757
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536757
** Also affects: gvfs (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536757
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argumen
right that's what the upstream bug suggests too
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
I suspect this bug is in libsmbclient and not in GNOME - I just reverted
libsmbclient from 3.4 that comes with Karmic to libsmbclient 3.3.4 , and
not everything works.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification be
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
I think the upstream link is working. The URL in the comment of
2009-06-29, leads to this page "Watching Another Project"
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Watches. I attempted the instructions to
add the link, but it appears that this was already done.
The "Remote bug watches" on the right side of thi
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: Unknown => New
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Opened GNOME bug #588391 :
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588391
I'm not sure how one links bugs in external trackers to launchpad.
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #588391
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588391
** Also affects: gvfs via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
This bug should be reported upstream, but I do not have a Gnome account.
I have read the instructions to report the bug, but I am not clear on
what to do (I do not understand the process).
Can someone please submit this bug upstream? Thank you.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument
I get this also on Karmic now, but it wasn't before and I have a good
indication that in my case its probably related to a server change
(Windows 2000 server).
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because yo
Same issue happening here on Karmic!
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
Thank you for your bug report. The issue is an upstream one and it would
be nice if somebody having it could send the bug the to the people
writting the software (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME)
** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) => gvfs (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Im
To be clear, the remote PC is running Win XP 32-bit with Service Pack 3
(all patches up-to-date). It is connected to the ubuntu PC via a local
shared router (local LAN, ip address = 192.168.1.3, 192.168.1.2), no
other PCs are on this network.
--
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
h
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28470339/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28470340/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28470341/ProcStatus.txt
--
smb: E
52 matches
Mail list logo
