[Bug 367063] Re: Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options

2009-08-08 Thread Mikael Karon
I just saw it on the blog mentioned above that Tenzer suggested that the "equivs" package could be used to work around this. Then again, 3.5 has been out for a while, and fixing this looks rather easy. Any ideas on why this would take so long to fix? -- Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependenc

[Bug 367063] Re: Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options

2009-08-08 Thread Jeppe Toustrup
@Pac Shady "If only dependencies could be overridden by the user." Yes, that would be nice, but I think it may have a few side effects. However, I wrote some thoughts about it on my blog, if it has any interest: http://tenzer.dk/some-thoughts-about-dependencies -- Firefox 3.5 should be one of th

[Bug 367063] Re: Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options

2009-08-08 Thread Pac Shady
I'd also like to see firefox-3.5 satisfy the dependencies for sun- java6-plugin. It's a waste of space having to install another browser simply to keep this plugin installed. If only dependencies could be overridden by the user. -- Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options https://bugs

[Bug 367063] Re: Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options

2009-07-07 Thread Jeppe Toustrup
Can't we get this fixed? Now that the final Firefox 3.5 is in the repositories, there is no need to have both the 3.0 and 3.5 versions installed, if you solely use Firefox 3.5. -- Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367063 You received this bug noti

[Bug 367063] Re: Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options

2009-04-25 Thread S.Lyons
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25981484/Dependencies.txt -- Firefox 3.5 should be one of the dependency options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun