Please reply if this is still an issue on a supported release.
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363140
Title:
pm-suspend
Hello, i seem to have a similar problem, but the trick with the locks didn't
solve the problem for me :(
in fact i did check before i issued the rm command and it didn't seem their
were locks so not a huge surprise.
never the less pm-suspend hangs my system badly and repeatable.
it does shu
Ouch ! I test it futhermore on VT and X and i should apologize : switching the
two lines have no effect.
Last night i introduced temporarely the previous "rm -f lockfile" in try_lock()
then deleted it afterwards ; that's have surely solve the issue for me...
The suspend2ram works again without p
On Saturday 29,August,2009 07:07 AM, Jean Luc Biellmann wrote:
> Proposition to solve the issue : just change the order of the lines in
> /usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action
>
> FROM :
>
> try_lock "${STASHNAME}.lock" || exit 1
>
> # make sure we release the lock no matter how we exit
> trap remove_
Proposition to solve the issue : just change the order of the lines in
/usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action
FROM :
try_lock "${STASHNAME}.lock" || exit 1
# make sure we release the lock no matter how we exit
trap remove_suspend_lock 0
TO :
# make sure we release the lock no matter how we exit
trap
Same problem and same solution on my Sony Vaio K215S - Ubuntu 9.04 -
2.6.28-13-server i686. I just removed the lock file with sudo rm
/var/run/pm-utils/locks/pm-suspend.lock and suspend works again.
jlb
--
pm-suspend doesn't work in Jaunty beta on ThinkPad T60
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 20:19 +, Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:40:08PM -, hyperair wrote:
> > No problem. But this bug is still a real bug. The locking mechanism is
> > broken (it leaves stale locks somehow).
>
> Will I have to continue to delete stale locks in that dire
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:40:08PM -, hyperair wrote:
> No problem. But this bug is still a real bug. The locking mechanism is
> broken (it leaves stale locks somehow).
Will I have to continue to delete stale locks in that directory?
Hopefully rm'ing the lock files is a one time thing after yo
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 18:19 +, Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:59:39PM -, hyperair wrote:
> > Looks like a stray lock. Run sudo rm -rf /var/run/pm-utils/locks/. I
> > believe this might be a duplicate of another bug.
>
> Indeed that fixed the problem. s2ram not needed a
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:59:39PM -, hyperair wrote:
> Looks like a stray lock. Run sudo rm -rf /var/run/pm-utils/locks/. I
> believe this might be a duplicate of another bug.
Indeed that fixed the problem. s2ram not needed anymore. Thanks for being so
on top of this bug.
cs
--
pm-suspen
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 17:34 +, Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 04:18:35AM -, hyperair wrote:
> > That's very weird. Could you post the output of:
> > sh -x /usr/sbin/pm-suspend
>
> Here it is. First I did a demo showing the contents of the log file
> didn't
> change..
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 04:18:35AM -, hyperair wrote:
> That's very weird. Could you post the output of:
> sh -x /usr/sbin/pm-suspend
Here it is. First I did a demo showing the contents of the log file didn't
change..
# sha1sum /var/log/pm-suspend.log
40e235f867b3af411ac9875665a16b45771f
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 04:07 +, Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:10:07AM -, hyperair wrote:
> > The proper way to use s2ram is to add a line SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp"
> > in /etc/pm/config.d/00sleep_module.
> >
> > But before that, it would be great if you could
> > post /var/
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:10:07AM -, hyperair wrote:
> The proper way to use s2ram is to add a line SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp"
> in /etc/pm/config.d/00sleep_module.
>
> But before that, it would be great if you could
> post /var/log/pm-suspend.log after attempting to run pm-suspend.
There was no
The proper way to use s2ram is to add a line SLEEP_MODULE="uswsusp"
in /etc/pm/config.d/00sleep_module.
But before that, it would be great if you could
post /var/log/pm-suspend.log after attempting to run pm-suspend.
--
Regards,
Chow Loong Jin
--
pm-suspend doesn't work in Jaunty beta on ThinkP
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683644/Dependencies.txt
--
pm-suspend doesn't work in Jaunty beta on ThinkPad T60
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
16 matches
Mail list logo
