Is this going to be included in hardy and jaunty backports?
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ruby1.9.1 is in karmic.
** Changed in: ruby1.9 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
Sorry I pressed "Submit" too soon. The reason for my request above is
because I'd like to have scripts use the following shebang line to say
they're written for Ruby1.9
#!/usr/bin/env ruby1.9
Thanks!
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug no
It seems that the ruby1.9 package still installs ruby 1.9.0
This package should install its binaries as ruby1.9 gem1.9 etc, and the
ruby1.9 package should point to it.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/ruby1.9.1
This seems to be fixed.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
This may not be a huge issue, but 1.9.1 uses Oniguruma. I was recently
playing around with embedding it into an Apache module on hardy and PHP
(5.2.4) causes it to segfault b/c it has it's own incompatible onig
version. To get around this, I compiled PHP 5.3.0 telling it to use
Ruby's onig code:
.
what patcito said.
please.. pretty please.
if i can have ruby1.9.1, and associated dev and rubygems, then gems can look
after everything else. sounds blissy to me!
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm talking about applications like booh, alexandria, puppet, etc. Of
> course, they can be installed from gems, but then the admin has to
> do all the support himself (check for security updates, etc).
>
You can do gem update to get the s
On 25/06/09 at 21:58 -, Darren Hinderer wrote:
> > And how would you deal with installing apps? especially the ones that
> > are compiled?
>
> I'm not positive I understand your question, but the way we install
> gems that compile with 1.8.7 would be the same as with 1.9.1. We
> install the ru
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Victor Costan wrote:
> For whatever it's worth, I'm on the same boat with patcito. Please give
> us good 1.9.1 version of ruby, ruby-dev and rubygems, and we'll take it
> from there.
>
rubygem is built in ruby1.9 so we just need ruby and ruby-dev :)
--
[needs-p
For whatever it's worth, I'm on the same boat with patcito. Please give
us good 1.9.1 version of ruby, ruby-dev and rubygems, and we'll take it
from there.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> We install the ruby-dev package, and any other ubuntu lib packages
that the gem requires. It can be annoying, but it works and I'm used to
it now.
This is how I work too, and most rubyists I know of on ubuntu.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received
> And how would you deal with installing apps? especially the ones that
> are compiled?
I'm not positive I understand your question, but the way we install
gems that compile with 1.8.7 would be the same as with 1.9.1. We
install the ruby-dev package, and any other ubuntu lib packages that
the gem
On 25/06/09 at 21:19 -, donpdonp wrote:
> i second Darrin's comment. I have no interest in ruby-support. I have
> ruby 1.9.0 happily installed and living side-by-side with ruby 1.8. Ruby
> itself manages the gems etc for different versions of ruby inside
> /usr/lib/ruby/.
>
> I want to do an a
Well I have done that, but I want ruby to be supported by my OS. The
libraries that I run on it are simply much less important to me than
the actual executable. I can ask the author of my library for support,
or go fork their work and update it myself in a timely manner.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:
i second Darrin's comment. I have no interest in ruby-support. I have
ruby 1.9.0 happily installed and living side-by-side with ruby 1.8. Ruby
itself manages the gems etc for different versions of ruby inside
/usr/lib/ruby/.
I want to do an apt-get update ruby1.9 and get some fresher bits, thats
a
On 25/06/09 at 20:29 -, Darren Hinderer wrote:
> I have no need for ruby-support as you have described it. I think its
> fair to say that most of us are content to suck down our libraries
> direct from rubygems or even github. IMHO the ruby community is
> growing and moving too fast for ubuntu
I have no need for ruby-support as you have described it. I think its
fair to say that most of us are content to suck down our libraries
direct from rubygems or even github. IMHO the ruby community is
growing and moving too fast for ubuntu to try to manage all of the
packages out there. In fact I'd
On 25/06/09 at 19:57 -, patcito wrote:
> If ubuntu is already packaging 1.9.0 with no ruby-support, why not
> upgrade it to 1.9.1? ruby-support can wait for karmic+1. I'm probably
> missing something.
ruby-support would allow to magically get support for all ruby versions
(inc. jruby), for all
If ubuntu is already packaging 1.9.0 with no ruby-support, why not
upgrade it to 1.9.1? ruby-support can wait for karmic+1. I'm probably
missing something.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
On 25/06/09 at 18:55 -, patcito wrote:
> I'm running Karmic and ruby 1.9.1 is still not available, will Karmic
> get it? Also, unlike Python 3.0, most ruby libs have been ported to
> 1.9.1 already, see http://isitruby19.com/ that includes hpricot, mysql,
> rails etc
Depends if someone is going
I'm running Karmic and ruby 1.9.1 is still not available, will Karmic
get it? Also, unlike Python 3.0, most ruby libs have been ported to
1.9.1 already, see http://isitruby19.com/ that includes hpricot, mysql,
rails etc
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You re
so, what's the progress on this one?
will it find its way in Karmic and backports for Jaunty?
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
@Daniel Lehman: your 'rubygems1.9' package install into
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/. It should be installed to 1.9.1 folder ELSE
running 'gem' will produce error.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I tried to use
sudo checkinstall
for creating a package after running make, but it failed with the following
error:
"""
/home/de/installs/ruby-1.9.1-p129/lib/fileutils.rb:848:in `utime': No such file
or directory - /usr/local/bin/ruby (Errno::ENOENT)
from /home/de/installs/ruby-1.9.1-p12
On 18/05/09 at 13:02 -, Niels Ganser wrote:
> With the recent release of the new version that donpdonp has pointed
> out, they are already lacking behind though.. :)
ah ah.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
It should be noted that 1.9.1 is already available in Debian
experimental: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/ruby1.9
With the recent release of the new version that donpdonp has pointed
out, they are already lacking behind though.. :)
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.
in the checkinstall recipe there is one step missing: "make" :-)
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
I've just spent some time trying to debug weird exceptions thrown by my
programs until I realized that Ubuntu comes with 1.9.0 which, as others
have pointed out, has never been considered a stable release..
So +1 on backporting 1.9.1. Ideally not only into jaunty but also the
latest LTS release.
Thx for the notice, I'll upload new packages asap (which could take 24
hours or so)
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
ruby 1.9.1-p129 has been released on 12-May-2009.
This is a patch level release for Ruby 1.9.1. This fixes many bugs and
two security vulnerabilities. This release contains security fix so we
recommend all 1.9.1 users to upgrade your ruby.
Please update the ubuntu package. thanks!
--
[needs-pac
I "ported" the ruby 1.9.1 packages from debian/experimental. Until there are
official (and professional packaged) packages feel free to use my personal
repository:
deb http://apt.l3h.de/ jaunty ruby
Please note:
The packages are definitely unsigned and probably broken. So use them with
caution
For those waiting, compiling from source and building a package with
checkinstall works great:
wget ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.gz
tar xvfz ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.gz
cd ruby-1.9.1-p0
./configure
sudo checkinstall
Note: the package that is built provides the Ruby 1.9.1 interp
Second for Ruby 1.9.1 in the Jaunty repo. It makes much more sense to
have 1.9.1 packaged than 1.9.0 since it is the first stable release of
the 1.9 series.
** Package changed: ubuntu => ruby1.9 (Ubuntu)
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug
Ruby 1.9.1 in jaunty really would be great. If your release schedule
doesn't allow this, could you please provide backports?
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Ruby 1.9.1 in jaunty would be great. Please do it.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
Ruby 1.9.0 was the development version. Ruby 1.9.1 is the first stable
version of the 1.9 series. The 1.9 series is amazingly faster than the
1.8 series, but has not been stable up until 1.9.1.
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notifica
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => New
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
>>Ruby 1.9.0 is already packaged in Ubuntu, from Dapper on.
Ruby 1.9.1 is not just bugfix or "little update" version of ruby 1.9.0.
It is in some cases incompartible, in some cases compartible more with
Ruby 1.8 branch(ex. Rails not working with 1.9.0 but 1.8.x and 1.9.1).
It was more than year ha
Ruby 1.9.0 is already packaged in Ubuntu, from Dapper on.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Invalid
** Tags removed: needs-packaging ruby
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This is an automated message ***
This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for
a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug
reports specification,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-
packaging bug reports have
** Description changed:
Ruby 1.9 is a new series of Ruby. It is modern, faster, with clearer syntax,
multilingualized, a much improved version of Ruby.
Ruby 1.8 series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on
it.
Today, the Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as the 1.8
42 matches
Mail list logo
