Possible Workaround from the user's side: In my case calling
./configure
as
./configure LDFLAGS=""
allowed me to compile my program.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317827
Title:
i
As predicted the bug has reappeared. And it seems to affect all
currently supported ubuntu versions. See:
-
https://launchpad.net/~maxima-developers/+archive/ubuntu/maxima-nightly/+build/13530410/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.maxima_5.41.0-2~201710010713~ubuntu12.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
-
[Expired for ecl (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ecl (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317827
Title:
No, sorry, I don't have any machine that can be reverted to such an
old version of binutils.
It could only happen when installing ecl on a machine with binutils
2.17, and Hardy (the oldest supported version) uses 2.18, so the bug
is now deprecated (it's almost 3 years old).
Note that if a new fla
Hi! I retry the install in all supported ubuntu versions and it installs
fine.
Could you retry please?
** Changed in: ecl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
I guess this problem can be solved with a right package dependency, if
confirmed?
--
install script crashes on unknown ld option -Bsylmbolic-functions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317827
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags added: packaging
--
install script crashes on unknown ld option -Bsylmbolic-functions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317827
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
I've found an explanation.
- When ecl package is built on the developer host, the flags given by
dpkg-buildpackage are stored in the install script.
- These flags include LDFLAGS => '-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions'
- When ecl is installed on the user host, it needs a version of /usr/bin/ld
which supp
