[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2022-03-25 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 Title: Sysprof support suboptimal To manage notifications about th

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-11-29 Thread Daniel Hahler
Ed, what looks wrong is "/bin/sh: 2.6.27-7-generic: not found".. I could not reproduce it (on Ubuntu Jaunty) (but don't know where the buildlogs are, to verify it). However, it's another problem (since the instructions should work normally). Can you please file a new bug for it (against sysprof a

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-11-28 Thread Ed
Sorry, here's my log file. ** Attachment added: "sysprof-module-source.buildlog.2.6.27-7-generic.1227901501" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20034745/sysprof-module-source.buildlog.2.6.27-7-generic.1227901501 -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 You received th

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-11-28 Thread Ed
I've tried following thos instructions, and I can't build this kernel module. It says: "/usr/bin/make KVERS=2.6.27-7-generic KDIR=/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-7-generic/bin/sh: 2.6.27-7-generic: not found /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-7-generic SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/sysprof

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-26 Thread Alexandre Racine
Thanks Daniel for those nice instructions. I think it is also a good idea to put that in the error. -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailin

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-26 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: sysprof (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: sysprof (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com ht

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-23 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #462321 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462321 ** Also affects: sysprof (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462321 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.laun

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-23 Thread Daniel Hahler
I've addressed this bug also in the debdiff for bug 46224, by making the error a lot more verbose and giving instructions to build the module. It adds the following at the end of the current "modprobe sysprof-module" message: ++ "You may need to build and install this module f

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-23 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-21 Thread Sven Herzberg
less /usr/share/doc/sysprof-module-source/README.Debian -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2008-01-20 Thread Alexandre Racine
How to build the kernel module would be nice! -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubun

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2007-03-16 Thread Murray Cumming
If there's some reason that the kernel module must be supplied only as source, it would be nice to see that reason in the package description. -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://launchpad.net/bugs/30160 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

[Bug 30160] Re: Sysprof support suboptimal

2006-08-16 Thread Vassilis Pandis
I second Sven's request. It would be nice if sysprof worked out of the box. ** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- Sysprof support suboptimal https://launchpad.net/bugs/30160 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/m