** Changed in: gforth (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
Title:
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
To manage notifications about
This was fixed in Debian in package version 0.7.0-0.1 and has been
included since Karmic. I will therefore mark this bug as Fix Released.
If this is still a bug for anyone, please re-open the bug. Thankyou!
** Changed in: gforth (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
gforth missing
** Also affects: gforth (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500640
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I have unsubscribed motu-release, not for us anymore.
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
0.6.2-7.3 _without_ ffcall support builds fine on my amd64.
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Thanks for testing everybody!
I had a conversation last year with the FreeBSD maintainer of gforth,
and he couldn't get gforth to build on the build farm with or without
libffcall1, though it always built on his home machine (and mine). It
could well be that this is a 64-bit issue, but I would lik
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 15:55 +, James Westby wrote:
> Hi Cesare,
>
> I just pushed the patched version to my PPA and it only failed on amd64,
> is that the arch that you were building on?
Cesare has confirmed that he is on amd64. This would indicate
that the ffcall code is not 64-bit clean. I'
I'm unsubscribing the sponsors team for now, please re-subscribe
them when ready. I'll stay subscribed in case you have any questions.
Thanks,
James
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Hi Cesare,
I just pushed the patched version to my PPA and it only failed on amd64,
is that the arch that you were building on?
The failure was apparently the same as in your log.
Thanks,
James
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bu
Nope, it doesn't build. Here attached is the build log if anybody wants
to work at it (no clear error message is spit out).
** Attachment added: "Build log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18105648/gforth.log
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You rec
Hi,
I'm going to have trouble sponsoring this as both the patched gforth
and the one in the archive fail to build on my machine with a Bus Error.
They build fine in my PPA though, so it's something specific to my
machine.
Is someone else willing to look at this?
Thanks,
James
--
gforth missin
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 21:58 +, Jason Woofenden wrote:
> I'm attaching two scripts.
>
> Just simple "do math and print result" type things.
>
> One uses ffcall to access libm's sin() and sinf(). The other uses
> builtin math primitives.
Great, thanks. I'll take a look at this tomorrow.
Thank
And here's the one that doesn't need ffcall.
** Attachment added: "nofftest.fs"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18095735/nofftest.fs
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
I'm attaching two scripts.
Just simple "do math and print result" type things.
One uses ffcall to access libm's sin() and sinf(). The other uses
builtin math primitives.
** Attachment added: "a simple test that requires ffcall"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18095722/fftest.fs
--
gforth miss
James,
As long as you'll mind after any problems that crop up, I say go ahead.
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:52 +, Jason Woofenden wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the additional functionality provided by ffcall in
> gforth is only activated when specifically requested by the programmer
> (as it is in some example scripts that come with gforth). So I don't
> think inclusion of ffcall
I'm pretty sure the additional functionality provided by ffcall in
gforth is only activated when specifically requested by the programmer
(as it is in some example scripts that come with gforth). So I don't
think inclusion of ffcall could possibly break any existing code written
for gforth.
If you
Hi,
I just noticed that the Debian maintainer is inactive, so waiting
for a response isn't a good idea.
I had a closer look at the package, and saw that ffcal support was
only recently added, which explains why it's not a dependency, so
I would be happy to add it.
However, my concern is not two-
Done!
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500640
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Hi,
Please forward this patch to Debian, as I think having their feedback on it
is important here. I certainly don't know enough to know that this is correct,
so I would want to see this before sponsoring.
Thanks,
James
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26
Without ffcall you cannot use libraries, so eg it's almost impossible to
write graphical programs or do networking.
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Which issues did you encounter without ffcall support? Could this be
forwarded to Debian too?
** Changed in: gforth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Attachment added: "debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17553199/debdiff
** Changed in: gforth (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
23 matches
Mail list logo
