[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2024-12-16 Thread Philip Cox
This version is no longer supported. If this is still reproducible on a newer/supported version, please reopen. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2011-12-16 Thread Phillip Susi
Well, it seems that who computes the idle time by using the timestamps of the tty device file, which are updated every time a process reads input. The problem is that X ( and also emacs ) don't read from the tty, so the timestamps are not updated. I think that fixing this is going to require over

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2011-03-30 Thread Phillip Susi
I agree. I was thinking of reassigning it to Xorg, but wasn't sure that was the correct component that is supposed to be updating utmp. Is the utmp file really updated every time you touch a key, and if so, by what program? I was thinking that can't be the case, so there must be some way the uti

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2011-03-30 Thread C de-Avillez
@Phillip: I am confused -- why do you think this is a 'who' issue? 'who' is a *browser* -- it only _reads_ the UTMP file, it does not change it at all. And, since more and more programmes do not update UTMP, 'who' is getting more and more unreliable. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2011-03-29 Thread Phillip Susi
Wow this is an old one, and seems to have gotten worse. Now even keyboard input does not reset the idle timer. ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2008-10-11 Thread Zakhar
I do agree with your answer, it's what I suggest as possible anwser n°1. Basically, if the answer is so, what I say is there is still a bug... in the documentation. Because who is a 30 years old *ix legacy, at this time a mouse was not a frequent input device, hence the documentation does not men

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2008-10-04 Thread hggdh
Thank you for reporting this bug and helping make Ubuntu better. I am downgrading this bug temporarily to Incomplete: 'who' (and 'pinky', a reduced version of 'finger') base their output on the utmp(5) file. Neither goes anywhere else. In other words, 'who' is very much restricted to browsing the

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2008-09-24 Thread Zakhar
After a few time of reflexion, here are my comments / suggestions about this bug. Who seems to be mainly a frontend to display nicely the informations in /var/run/utmp (or /var/log/wtmp for the history). The documentation says that these files, unfortunately (because it's not vey good architectu

[Bug 268780] Re: who (or w) does not report correctly idle time

2008-09-10 Thread Jonathan Ben-Joseph
Zakhar, I was able to confirm this bug using the suggestion you described. ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- who (or w) does not report correctly idle time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub