[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-31 Thread Marcos
Hi! I reinstall b43-fwcutter, It's crash with exit error 1. I restart in english, reinstall again, and It reinstalled fine. I disable wl in "Hardware drivers" and enable only B43 and IT WORKS FINE! I have got Wifi in Intrepid :D Thanks very much! -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-27 Thread Martin Pitt
ullix, this is not intended. You should see at least one of b43 and wl ("STA") in jockey, or both. Please file a separate bug about this one. -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-27 Thread ullix
For some time now the B43 wireless driver was working well. I noticed the alternative Broadcom STA driver and changed to it, and it is also working well. In fact the transfer speed judged by mythtv smoothness is consistently better (and it is showing 54Mb/s where previously on B43 I had only 1-6Mb/

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-27 Thread Marcos
Not works for me :( Updated yesterday to the last updates. I put others bug about this, and was change the status as duplicate. Best regards and thanks! -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-26 Thread Martin Pitt
HDave, right now this is actually on purpose. I was told that it isn't possible to load both ssd (and b44) and wl at the same time. So if you load wl first, and then b44, do both the wifi and the ethernet card actually work? If so, we should modify the handler accordingly; please file a new bug in

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-26 Thread HDave
I am using the latest Intrepid on a laptop with a Broadcom BCM4328 and this still isn't working for me. In my case, B44 was being loaded (and thus ssd) prior to jockey attempting to utilize "wl". Therefore my wireless networking adapter (wlan0) never show up. I had to work around this problem b

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Pitt
Copied to hardy-updates, thanks for testing! ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
With the improvements to bug 271191, I can confirm it fully works now. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-08 Thread Mario Limonciello
I can confirm that the upload works as expected in the default case, but this *can't* enter -updates until bug 271191 is fixed too. -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verificat

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package jockey - 0.5~beta1-0ubuntu2 --- jockey (0.5~beta1-0ubuntu2) intrepid; urgency=low * Merge some bug fixes from trunk: - ui.py: Fix "not installed" -> "not activated" string inconsistency. (LP: #274697) - Fix typos in German translation.

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Adapted the wl handler to intrepid now, too, and committed to bzr. Will upload after beta freeze. If somebody already wants to try this: bzr get ubuntu-core-dev/jockey/ubuntu/ jockey-ubuntu cd jockey-ubuntu debuild -us -uc -b sudo dpkg -i ../*.deb ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu Intrepid)

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-10-01 Thread Martin Pitt
For the record, this is the debdiff. ** Attachment added: "hardy debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18105627/jockey.hardy-wl.debdiff ** Description changed: Fresh install of kubuntu Intrepid alpha 5, then full update. Attempt detection of wlan hardware with Hardware Drivers Manager, w

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-30 Thread Martin Pitt
Subscribed ubuntu-sru, I cannot ack my own upload, so Steve needs to do it. -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-30 Thread Martin Pitt
jockey (0.3.3-0ubuntu8.1) hardy-proposed; urgency=low . Fix configuration of "b43" vs. the new "wl" wifi driver. (LP: #263097) . * jockey/oslib.py: Check all /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist* files in module_blacklisted(). The new Broadcom wl driver generates blacklist-bcm43, which Jock

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-30 Thread Martin Pitt
Test packages for hardy: http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp/jockey-wl/ I asked Mario and Tim for testing. If all goes well, I'll upload these to hardy-proposed. ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-30 Thread Marcos
Confirm in Intrepid Ibex, laptop nx 7300. -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-27 Thread ullix
After updating (now: uname -a: Linux cy810 2.6.27-4-generic #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 01:30:51 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux) I can now connect to the wlan; it actually seems to be doing it faster than before. But the script may not be complete: first, the wlan access key is asked every time I start the compute

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-25 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu Intrepid) Target: None => ubuntu-8.10 -- wl vs. b43 are not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Test package for hardy available at http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp /jockey-wl/ ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Triaged => Inval

[Bug 263097] Re: wl vs. b43 are not properly configured

2008-09-24 Thread Martin Pitt
The driver side is ok now (not really optimal, since they constantly fight each other, and if you have b44, all bets are off for using wl), but since wl is not free software, we can't do a lot about it besides bugging broadcom. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu Hardy) Sourcepackagena