Thanks Patrick, you have some good ideas. I will confirm this and see
what the process is for requesting a backport is. As for the
scripts/sudo, that probably deserves a separate bug report, I think it
will get proper attention that way.
By the way, there is no need to copy all the quotes in your
Oh, for reference I've attached the init scripts I'm talking about.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Patrick C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Actually, I was hoping for it to be put into backports. I'm not very
> familiar with the versioning system for Ubuntu, but I am familiar enough
> that the fi
Actually, I was hoping for it to be put into backports. I'm not very
familiar with the versioning system for Ubuntu, but I am familiar enough
that the first thing I did to check for the new version was look
hardy-backports and, as a last resort, Intrepid.
I would consider 1.8.2 to be a "bugfix-onl
Thanks Patrick. This isn't really considered out-of-date by our
standards, since packages aren't typically updated starting from a
couple months BEFORE the new version of Ubuntu is released (ie Hardy
packages were updated to the most recent version roughly 6 months ago,
so if THEY themselves hadn't
