source and libmilter-dev, libmilter1.0.1-dbg, libmilter1.0.1 binaries
promoted to main.
** Changed in: sendmail (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
MIR for Sendmail (libmilter)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243128
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I don't really like having the entire sendmail source in main either,
but the only alternative for us would be to maintain both the upstream
and the packaging split-out on our own, which is painful.
--
MIR for Sendmail (libmilter)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243128
You received this bug notif
I would guess it's possible, but I don't think it is the best approach.
I did discuss this with pitti on IRC and he thought it would be the best
way to do it.
We would have to essentially repackage libmilter from scratch as nearly
as I can determine and would always run the risk of sendmail and
li
is it really necessary to promote the complete sendmail code? could the
libmilter code splitted out into its own source and sendmail b-d on it?
** Changed in: sendmail (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
MIR for Sendmail (libmilter)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243128
You received th
Discussed this earlier today on IRC with pitti.
--
MIR for Sendmail (libmilter)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243128
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
