Supported in Saucy (and I think it would be available already in 13.04
as well).
Closing as Fix Released.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: network-manager-applet
Status: In Progress => Expired
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: In Progress => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
T
** Changed in: network-manager-applet
Status: Unknown => In Progress
** Changed in: network-manager-applet
Importance: Unknown => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
T
** Also affects: network-manager-applet via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540995
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Titl
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Title:
nm should support easy bonding
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: network-manager
Importance: Wishlist => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Title:
nm s
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Title:
nm should support easy bonding
To manage notifications about this b
** Changed in: network-manager
Importance: Critical => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Title:
nm should support easy bonding
To manage notifications about this bug
I don't know, I've never actually tried to use NM with a virtual interface that
has slave physical interfaces. And yes, it seems to me too that mentioning an
interface in the interfaces file makes NM not touch it. NM has its own
configuration storage, which, as I've read, is not intended for hum
Mlx, but can I configure a device there, that NM *can* use? I always
took it that the devices there kind of supersede NM. So if I configure
eth0 and wlan0 to *not* do DHCP so that bond0 can, what will happen when
I'm in an environment where my static bonding configuration does not
apply and I need
I believe that Redhat's network-scripts are above network-manager and
NM will not touch any interface that is configured using ifcfg and
doesn't have a special line in the file (NM_MANAGED it is, I think).
In (Debian and) Ubuntu, the role of network-scripts is taken by
/etc/network/interfaces. See
Zsolt, in terms of documentation there is http://docs.redhat.com/docs
/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/s1
-networkscripts-interfaces.html of course. "NetworkManager is graphical
configuration tool which provides an easy way to make changes to the
various network interface con
0.9.4 got into precise but I could not find any documentation about how
to configure bonding with it.
Unfortunately I have found some mention by the upstream developers that
currently only Red Hat based systems are supported (if I have understood this
correctly):
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/
This would not only be awesome and dearly needed to seamlessly switch
between fast Ethernet and relatively slow wifi but also to speed up
networking where there is no gigabit (like on netbook hardware). Heck,
you could even add USB Ethernet adapters to the mix as you wished.
--
You received this
On 11-12-28 09:38 AM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> For all intents and purposes, bonding is now supported by NM
> (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/log/?qt=grep&q=bonding).
Sweet! Has the use-case of bonding a standard ethernet interface with
WPA[2]-protected wifi int
Probably watching activity on gitweb :) I've learned about bonding
support in dcbw's blog post: http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2011/11/10
/blue-sky-white-sand-and-networkmanager-0-9-2/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
For all intents and purposes, bonding is now supported by NM
(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/log/?qt=grep&q=bonding).
However, only the backend supports it, there is no way to configure it
from the applet (you'll need to write the config files manually, and
there is littl
Is there somewhere/how I can track this work upstream? The upstream bug
mentioned here doesn't seem to have anything new in it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Title:
nm should
Upstream is working on this bug. NM 0.9.4 should support bonding.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Title:
nm should support easy bonding
To manage notifications about this bug g
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: network-manager
Importance: Wishlist => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
Title:
nm shou
** Changed in: network-manager
Importance: Unknown => Wishlist
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Can someone more informed than me tell me what the progress on this (in Karmic)
is? After a googling session, I decided to simply add the relevant contents of
/usr/share/doc/ifenslave-2.6/examples/ethernet+wifi to /etc/network/interfaces:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
#
FWIW, that patch is mine.
It's a patch to NM that prevents the IP configuration steps on a "slave"
(i.e. bonded) interface. This allows you to create a bonded interface
in /etc/network/interfaces (bug #328665 has an example of how to do
this) but still let's NM select a wireless network to connec
I marked Bug #328665 as a duplicate. It has a patch attached to it*,
which may be interesting to the followers of this bug.
* yay! I'm tired of my homegrown solution ;-)
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: New => Triaged
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
> would this allow me to use [...] 1 interface for firefox and 1 interface for
> torrents?
The point of bonding is to make two interfaces look like one, so you'd be
trying to shovel water uphill if you want to partially break the illusion.
I suppose you could write an iptables module that lets y
I would definately like this idea added, would this allow me to use 2
wireless interfaces at once, like use 1 interface for firefox and 1
interface for torrents? How would I be able to use 2 wireless
interfaces at the same time?
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Unknown => New
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
** Also affects: network-manager via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540995
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
[To make the graph connected] See:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540995
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/10534/
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Also, you might want to suggest it upstream as well for faster up-take:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/NetworkManager/
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I would definitely vote for this idea! Since it is not a bug however,
our best bet would be if you reported it to http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com
Please do so to kick off some discussion about it.
Cheers
--
nm should support easy bonding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23
You received this bug
32 matches
Mail list logo
