** Changed in: debian
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
Title:
Zotero (Firefox extension)
To manage notifications about this bug go t
** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
Title:
Zotero (Firefox extension)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
The above comment applies to the FF plugin, not the standalone desktop
client.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
Title:
Zotero (Firefox extension)
To manage notifications about t
No way forward in Ubuntu to get it in the repos, the solution is to use
addons.mozilla.org to get it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
Title:
Zotero (Firefox extension)
To manag
If zotero was to be included in repo's, that would be great!
Zotero has many users, and geting it from the software center would be nice &
professional!
Perhaps Zotero standalone is viable for inclusion into ubuntu repositories?
see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/782079
It has already b
So then the bug can be left as is. I was just thinking that maybe
something about it could have been useful in some way.
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
It's nothing to do with "improving statistics". Shipping lots of random
extensions in our archive is not compatible with the new Firefox support
model, and will be a significant maintenance burden in the future
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this
That's fine by me, the original reporter. After the initial responses to
this bug, I decided I didn't really care about the matter.
I only added information today for people who might find this bug when
searching for information about using Zotero with Lucid.
Close the bug if it will improve stat
This is WONTFIX really, as we're currently going through a process of
reducing the number of extensions in the archive. In the future, we want
to keep the list of supported extensions in the archive to an absolute
minimum.
See the spec here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxN
The java problem is version-dependent. For example, I'm using the
icedtea plugin with Zotero 2.02, Firefox 3.5.8 and OpenOffice.org 3.2
with no issues.
My understanding is that for Zotero's integration with OpenOffice.org to work
with Firefox ≥ 3.6, IcedTea6 1.7 is required, specifically the new
In an attempt to revive this thread, I thought I would mention that
Zotero is now at version 2.0.2, and considered stable.
Zotero is quickly becoming an essential tool for academics, and as an
academic myself I feel it is important that it gets included in the
repos (I think it should even be in t
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #504058
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504058
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504058
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
We should not update a backports extensions for every release. causes
too many openings for bugs, maybe updating every month or 3 or whatever.
A time should be set and do we want unstable extensions in LTS?
Saša: what do you feel about ECL license.
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.laun
Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:57:34AM -, sybille wrote:
>
>> @Dimitrios Symeonidis: Thanks for taking the time to post again, I
>> appreciate and accept your apology.
>>
>> @John Vivirito:
>> @Alexander Sack:
>> I've been thinking about this project, and before proceedin
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:57:34AM -, sybille wrote:
> @Dimitrios Symeonidis: Thanks for taking the time to post again, I
> appreciate and accept your apology.
>
> @John Vivirito:
> @Alexander Sack:
> I've been thinking about this project, and before proceeding, I'd like to
> talk with you gu
> Yes, in the end, I do think it would be best to wait on packaging Zotero
> for Ubuntu.
>
> Perhaps it's worth noting that Zotero is not at all unstable from a
> user's point of view, or at least, it's not for me. I've been using it
> fairly extensively for over a year now and had no real problem
Yes, in the end, I do think it would be best to wait on packaging Zotero
for Ubuntu.
Perhaps it's worth noting that Zotero is not at all unstable from a
user's point of view, or at least, it's not for me. I've been using it
fairly extensively for over a year now and had no real problems (i.e.,
dat
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57 AM, sybille wrote:
> So, I'd like to find out more about whether the Ubuntu package can get
> updated as Zotero is updated, which I suppose would involve backports.
We are working on a procedure to make it easier to maintain extensions
[1]. However, it's still not don
@Dimitrios Symeonidis: Thanks for taking the time to post again, I
appreciate and accept your apology.
@John Vivirito:
@Alexander Sack:
I've been thinking about this project, and before proceeding, I'd like to talk
with you guys about how backports work for Firefox extensions that have been
pack
Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:52:19AM -, John Vivirito wrote:
>> Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:23:25PM -, sybille wrote:
Hi john, and thanks for taking a look at this.
Zotero is in the "Suggested extensions missing details" section
I want to apologise to sybille for blocking this earlier... Sorry
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:52:19AM -, John Vivirito wrote:
> Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:23:25PM -, sybille wrote:
> >> Hi john, and thanks for taking a look at this.
> >>
> >> Zotero is in the "Suggested extensions missing details" section of this
> >> wiki page:
Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:23:25PM -, sybille wrote:
>> Hi john, and thanks for taking a look at this.
>>
>> Zotero is in the "Suggested extensions missing details" section of this wiki
>> page:
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List?action=show&redirect
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:23:25PM -, sybille wrote:
> Hi john, and thanks for taking a look at this.
>
> Zotero is in the "Suggested extensions missing details" section of this wiki
> page:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List?action=show&redirect=MozillaTeam%2FFirefox3Exten
The OOo extension is specifically for Zotero. Basically, it allows Zotero to be
used as a Bibliography manager for OOo. You can see more about how it works
here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Zotero#Integration%20with%20OpenOffice.org
(There's a screenshot, too :).)
The Zotero extension is a
We had an OO.o extension packaged but last time i looked it was removed
from repos but gutsy does have it not sure why it was removed.
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Marking as incomplete until work is complete on it, I moved to to Maintained or
currently worked on extensions from Suggested extensions missing details a
little while ago. Thanks for your help on getting the info. Is this something
you plan on packaging or would you rather somone else did? If y
Hi john, and thanks for taking a look at this.
Zotero is in the "Suggested extensions missing details" section of this wiki
page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List?action=show&redirect=MozillaTeam%2FFirefox3Extensions
I put it in that section because there is a question about t
Brian Murray wrote:
> I justed noticed it is already on that wiki page but I think it should
> move the missing details bit to need a maintainer.
>
I will look at it to see if it needs more info before continuing to
needs a maintainer. What section is it under atm? i will look once im
done with em
I justed noticed it is already on that wiki page but I think it should
move the missing details bit to need a maintainer.
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
If you could update the wiki page,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions, with the
extension you are interested in that would be quite helpful. It should
belong in either the Extensions that Need a Maintainer table or the
Suggested Extensions Missing Details table. I was not quic
There is actually a wiki page documenting need firefox extensions and a
project for creating packages of extensions people are interested in.
Subsequently, I am setting the bug to Confirmed and Wishlist.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
Hmm, in fact you're right, there's several extentions under World Wide Web
(universe), I was not aware of that.
You could add this suggestion to the Brainstorm website.
You are very polite, and don't worry about wasting time, looking into
this issue was actually quite educating.
Feel free to rep
Hmm, not to be argumentative, but it seems to me that there are a series
of Firefox extensions included in Ubuntu. For example:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adblock-plus
But maybe what you mean is that packages in the Universe repository are
not considered to be "in Ubuntu."
Like I said b
Dear Sybille, I have asked Brian Murry (of Canonical, and the man who
changed the status of bug 158835 to 'confirmed') on the issue, but got
no answer.
My assignment as 'Invalid' was in accordance with the guidelines in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs.
Furthermore, no Firefox extensions W
I'm not sure that Zotero is my "favorite extension," whatever that
means, but it is a useful if specialized tool for researchers and
students. And, I believe that including this kind of software in Ubuntu
will help with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
Anyway, I've added a Zotero documenta
Dear Sybille,
I have nothing against your favorite extension. The points you made are
valid, and I am seeking advice from people more experienced than myself.
Anyway, thank you for your time and effort in making Ubuntu better.
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
I'm sorry, it wasn't meant as an advertisement. I really would like to
see Zotero packaged for Ubuntu, and maybe to see if I can help out with
that.
I opened this bug because I thought that was expected. I was following the
instructions on the page for Firefox extensions in the Ubuntu wiki:
https
This is an advertisment. Marking as invalid.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Invalid
--
Zotero (Firefox extension)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
40 matches
Mail list logo
