[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2013-03-19 Thread Thomas Hotz
** Changed in: eject (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 Titl

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2013-03-18 Thread Matthew Caron
It is no longer an issue in Precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 Title: eject command fails with "unable to open" error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2013-03-18 Thread Thomas Hotz
Matthew we are wondering if it is still an issue for you? Thank you for telling us! ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: eject (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2012-08-23 Thread Dave Gilbert
I was going to say that the answer was udisks --eject /dev/whatever , but I noticed that udisksctl (which I think is udisks2 replacement) doesn't have --eject; so I wonder what the right answer is. If udisks is the right way to go these days then perhaps replacing eject my a small shell script to

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2011-06-09 Thread Adam Buchbinder
I don't think it's the same issue; this one is about how to grant users certain permissions (is that even relevant? are people just supposed to use "udisks --unmount /dev/whatever"? that's not as simple as "eject /mnt/mount-path", since you need to know the device name), and the other is about ejec

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2011-06-09 Thread Bryce Harrington
This might be a case of bug #795239, but hard to tell for sure. Take a look and see what you think. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 Title: eject command fails with "unable to o

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2009-01-21 Thread Matthew Caron
Sorry it took me so long to get back to you on this, I've been busy. - I agree that making eject suid is a suboptimal solution. No argument there. - I believe that eject is different vs. a simple umount. It does something to the USB device, though I'm not sure what. This is best illustrated by pl

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2009-01-06 Thread Adam Buchbinder
The problem isn't with eject; eject is working properly... I think. The permissions for /dev/sdb1 (on my machine, that's the first USB disk's ID) are 660, and it's owned by root:disk. I can add myself to the 'disk' group, but that gives me raw access to any fixed disk on the system, and I don't thi

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Caron
This is true for both Hardy and Intrepid. -- eject command fails with "unable to open" error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Caron
This is still an issue. I "solved" it by making eject setuid. -- eject command fails with "unable to open" error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2008-11-29 Thread JaysonRowe
Since it's been a very long time since any additional info was added to this bug, I'm just checking to see if this is still an issue, and find out what additional work should be done on this bug. -- eject command fails with "unable to open" error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 You receive

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2008-05-28 Thread Matthew Caron
The CD is ATAPI, but all cdrom devices I've used in recent history (since early 2.6 series) have been using the new disk abstraction layer and thus appear as SCSI devices. This is increasingly true for ATA hard disks as well - this same desktop has the ATA hard disk showing as sda. Before hardy, it

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2008-05-28 Thread Mauricio Peñaloza S .
Thanks, i saw your file, and anything is wrong (but i have a doubt) your Cd is SATA? Because my unit is ATAPI and appears like /dev/hdc ** Changed in: eject (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => eject -- eject command fails with "unable to open" error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 You re

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2008-05-28 Thread Matthew Caron
Attached ** Attachment added: "fstab" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14772961/fstab -- eject command fails with "unable to open" error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 235202] Re: eject command fails with "unable to open" error

2008-05-27 Thread Mauricio Peñaloza S .
Can you post your file /etc/fstab? Thanks ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- eject command fails with "unable to open" error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -