NeCod, do be careful not to let the mobo re-write that HPA. From my
(very bad) experience with that Gigabyte board, a reset of the CMOS, a
BIOS flash, a bad stick of RAM, or just playing around with the BIOS
backup tools in the wrong way can cause it to do this without warning
you. (the driver C
Thanks EagleDM, i will try it.
Maybe I can avoid reinstalling everything, if i follow this post
http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/showpost.php?p=3329132&postcount=6
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug notification
You have the " member offline" when you disable HPA because the metadata
for the RAID0 is actually being stored on the HPA of that disk, when you
disable it, you lost the configuration, that's why it won't work until you
actully remove HPA and start a fresh RAID0, once you do that, metadata no
lon
Wait.
If you actually disable HPA you will lost your " current" RAID configuration
since the bios actually STORES RAID0 array information in the HPA area.
What you HAVE to do to get rid of this nightmare is to backup the entire
array, disassemble the raid setup, go to HDAT2, REMOVE HPA, create th
I have tried EagleDM solution with HDAT2, and it doesn't works for me.
If i disabled HPA, i cannot boot to RAID partition's: first member offline.
My motheboard is GA-P35-DS4.
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug noti
AS I already stated before and again, look for the HDAT2 utility, can be put
on a booteable CD (dos based)
Configure your hard disk as "IDE" (for the moment) boot with a booteable cd
and run HDAT2 (I think hdat2 comes with a booteable cd now)
Run HDAT2, and disable HPA from both disks.
Your pr
Hello,
I am currently using Ubuntu 10.04 using the P35-DS3R raid as described
above. I have 2 drives in RAID 0 config and ubuntu installed on another
IDE drive. I don't care about seeing the raid, but I am being affected
by the HPA problem. It always seems to unlock one of my RAID drives
which
@all it works by adding "libata.ignore_hpa=0" to the kernel command line
after this you have the access to the raid in the live CD so you can install ...
after installing you have to install dmraid in you new system
(chrooting) and adding the hpa=0 to the kernel line and in modprobe.d
http://foru
@Matthias:
"I added "libata.ignore_hpa=0" to the kernel command line"
Great! It worked very well for me on Ubuntu 9.04b (but grub fail to
start after install)
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug notification because y
Hello,
i found a solution to resolve the issue on jaunty as the previous trick
didn't work.
I added "libata.ignore_hpa=0" to the kernel command line and it seems to
work, my raid array isn't broken on shut down.
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Hello,
i've got the ame issue with Jaunty Alpha 5, i tried the solution to add
"options libata ignore_hpa=0" in /etc/modprobe.d/options or libata-
options without success.
Before i did the same manipulation on intrepid ibex and i worked without
problem.
Has someone resolved the issue on Jaunty ?
Hello,
i've got the ame issue with Jaunty Alpha 5, i tried the solution to add
"options libata ignore_hpa=0" in /etc/modprobe.d/options or libata-
options without success.
Before i did the same manipulation on intrepid ibex and i worked without
problem.
Has someone resolved the issue on Jaunty ?
P3P, your issue appears to have nothing to do with the Host Protected
Area. It looks like your problem is bug #292302.
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I have installed the Ubuntu 8.10 system in the RAID5 with debootstrap
from the Ubuntu installed on the RAID0.
But Ubuntu 8.10 intrepid can not boot because dmraid have this error:
ERROR: isw device for volume "zerovol" broken on /dev/sda in RAID set
"isw_baeaijeeda_zerovol"
ERROR: isw: wrong # of
System:
* Ubuntu 8.10 amd64 (not installed yet)
* Intel Software Raid from ICH9R southbridge, ASUS P5K-E motherboard
* 4 hard disks with two raid arrays (one RAID0 array and one RAID5 array).
I am trying to install Ubuntu Intrepid on the fakeraid but none of the
solutions worked for me.
Dmraid fa
Ops I forgot ! Now it all just works :-) Thanks
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Did you run update-initramfs after editing the options?
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Hi, sorry for my english
I have the same problem, won't recognize he RAID 0 array on my ICH9R, (Gigabyte
GA-P35-DS3R) warm reboot gives "member offline" for both member disks, but a
cold reboot restores them to normal operational status. Using 8.10 Alpha 4
dmraid works fine.
In official release
.Just I wanna clap this f ucking job, I have been using 8.10 since beta, and
this problem was over but now with the final the problem returned, indeed good
job and indeed you are sucker who are busy with this bug. I m so angry really
and final word
/clap/clap/clap/clap/cl
--
HPA (
I have found a utility that will avoid you having to use the workaround
for HPA. This utility will allow you to remove the HPA from your hard
drive permanently in most cases. You have to have the hard drive on a
SATA port that is in AHCI mode, not in RAID mode when you run this
bootdisk and utili
hello Philip Susi,
i posted it becouse of email from "fincan"
[qote]
well ubuntu 8.04.1 is here, could you try it to check for the bug plz? I
dont have chance to try it now. indeed I wonder the result.
[/qote]
i was just a test under 8.04.1.
if im booting with only one raid combination it seems
Masa, your issue does not appear to be related to this bug.
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Its real mystical.
im just hot plugged off the two hdds (raid 0) devices (
/dev/mapper/isw_dgeabjbggg_vc )
1. damraid -an
2. plug off
3. dmraid -ay
now is isw_cbjdigdega_vb back !
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls /dev/mapper/
controlisw_cbjdigdega_vb1 isw_cbjdigdega_vb3 isw_cbjdigdega_vb
Hello,
im live on ubuntu 8.04.1 (hardy 64-Bit).
how i am booting into the live cd:
1. break=top (kernel startup line)
2. echo options libata ignore_hpa=0 > /etc/modprobe.d/libata-options
3. Seting the option in Synaptic universe
4. refreshing the packages
5. installing dmraid
6. starting dmraid
I didn't have the file, either. All you have to do is create the empty
(and writable) file libata-options in /etc/modprobe.d/ and then open it
with your favorite text editor and add "options libata ignore_hpa=0".
That's the only line that needs to be in there.
Once you've done that, the "sudo upd
Hi,
I actually have the same problem like Pinocheckio, I can't find the
libata-options file anywhere...
Anyone have another idea on how to bypass the problem?
--
HPA ( Host Protected Area ) interferes with dmraid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219393
You received this bug notification because
Mhm well my array is broken again, after updating initramfs for something that
had nothing to do with it :(
So when i try to rebuild, it takes only 1 or 2 disks in the array, also ubuntu
has problems with reading to right partition table from one disk. So i did a
very good format this time that
It seems that this will not be fixed. The old IDE driver was always
broken in that it ignored the HPA. When this was fixed in libata, it
caused breakage for people who had already formatted their disks with
the old driver, then upgraded, and were no longer able to access the
whole disk. For this
28 matches
Mail list logo
