[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2009-10-26 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 409119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409119 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 409119 Configuration of flashplugin-installer succeeds even when download fails -- package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded https://bugs.launchpad.ne

Re: [Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-05-07 Thread John Vivirito
sam wrote: > Hi, > I had already tried that and it works, that is not the issue, but > appreciate your advise. > > have you tried :- > down grade your flash > apt-get -dy dist-upgrade > /etc/init.d/network stop > apt-get dist-upgrade > > from what I understand :- > The file flashplugin-nonfree.po

Re: [Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-05-07 Thread sam
Hi, I had already tried that and it works, that is not the issue, but appreciate your advise. have you tried :- down grade your flash apt-get -dy dist-upgrade /etc/init.d/network stop apt-get dist-upgrade from what I understand :- The file flashplugin-nonfree.postinst contains "set -e" which me

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-29 Thread John Vivirito
Please try to remove it using either apt-get remove --purge flashplugin-nonfree if that fails to work please try sudo dpkg -r flashplugin-nonfree and than once removed please install the package again when you have a few minutes of connection hopfully if im right its just a corrupt download due

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-29 Thread John Vivirito
Michael, if apt inst at fault please let me know but i think its just the net failure, I havent seenany other flash bugs like this one is one reason i feel its connection that corrupted package -- package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218597 You received

Re: [Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-29 Thread sam
Hi, I am sorry for not being clear. The network was not working, and flash is already installed, this is for the upgrade when dpkg runs to upgrade flash, it runs a script which downloads flash, right? if the script fails (in my case because the network was broken) then dpkg marks the operation a

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-27 Thread John Vivirito
It failed because the download never completed maybe once you got connections it finished. Since this isnt really a bug and dpkg gave the false report isnt against flash or mozilla products what exactly are you looking for to happen? Is flash installed in your profile dir. did you get a "download m

Re: [Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-27 Thread sam
hi, I have upgraded, so assume the files are pointless. it's 32 bit, was ubuntu 7.10. I think the problem of the dpkg install succeeding but the flash download and upgrade failing leaving the system thinking it has the latest flash On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 5:15 AM, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-27 Thread sam
no, I did not have net access at the time. On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 5:18 AM, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you recieved the following error you did or did not have a net > connection? > > >Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.124.0ubuntu1~gutsy1) ... > >Downloading... > >--20:37:2

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-18 Thread Kees Cook
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue -- package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-18 Thread John Vivirito
When you recieved the following error you did or did not have a net connection? >Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.124.0ubuntu1~gutsy1) ... >Downloading... >--20:37:27-- >http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz > => `./install_flash

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-18 Thread John Vivirito
Can you please post the output of cat /etc/apt/sources.list to this bug. What version of Ubuntu are you seeing this on? Can you also please post the output of apt-cache policy flashplugin-nonfree. Is this on a 64bit arch that you are seeing this? ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) As

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-17 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: apt => flashplugin-nonfree -- package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubunt

[Bug 218597] Re: package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded

2008-04-17 Thread Kees Cook
** Visibility changed to: Public -- package failed to upgrade but marked as upgraded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://