[Bug 2097688] Re: [BPO] Backport Noble version to Jammy

2025-02-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
@tsimonq2: acqully no, in backports we follow the security team recommendation about versioning, and we also explicitly document on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports#Preparing_the_Backported_Package an example which has two ubuntu releases in the version string. I agree it is a bit jarring t

[Bug 2097688] Re: [BPO] Backport Noble version to Jammy

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Quigley
Hey Jorge, thanks for the patch! Could you please separate out the histories for 24.04 and 22.04? Meaning, changelog entries with a 24.04 suffix should not go into 22.04. This may make the diff quite large; in this case, it would be helpful to provide a diff against https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s

[Bug 2097688] Re: [BPO] Backport Noble version to Jammy

2025-02-08 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "lp2097688.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu- sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if

[Bug 2097688] Re: [BPO] Backport Noble version to Jammy

2025-02-08 Thread Jorge Merlino
Debdiff against Noble version of openvpn ** Patch added: "lp2097688.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/2097688/+attachment/5855846/+files/lp2097688.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt