[Bug 2096808] Re: Sync euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable

2025-02-03 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Changed in: euslisp (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Description changed: - Please add euslisp/jskeus packages from Debain testing release - (https://packages.debian.org/source/testing/euslisp) + Please remove euslisp and jskeus from the sync blocklist and sync them + to Ubun

[Bug 2096808] Re: Sync euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable

2025-02-03 Thread Mirko Ferrati
@k-okada thanks for your answer, I think it's ok to put your non-ROS package back now that we cleared the confusion. Unrelated to this bug but what do you think about updating your readmes in github to explain that euslisp can be installed on more recent Ubuntu versions and that it no longer ne

[Bug 2096808] Re: Sync euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable

2025-01-30 Thread Kei Okada
@mirkoferrati Thanks for the explanation. EusLisp/jskeus was originally developed independently of the ROS system, as it was born around the mid-80s. However, we did not provide a binary release until we joined the PR2/ROS project. We only provide Makefile and instructions to build from source tr

[Bug 2096808] Re: Sync euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable

2025-01-30 Thread Mirko Ferrati
Hello @k-okada! I may have been fooled by the binary installation instructions in the upstream repository of euslisp https://github.com/euslisp/EusLisp?tab=readme-ov-file#binary-installation-recommended which recommends to follow the instructions at jskeus repository which at the first step say

[Bug 2096808] Re: Sync euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable

2025-01-29 Thread Jeremy Bícha
We need input from Mirko who is involved in the decisionmaking about the removal of ROS packages from Ubuntu. ** Summary changed: - Merge euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable + Sync euslisp/jskeus from Debian unstable ** Changed in: euslisp (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mirko Ferrati (m