Verified:
* dracut-install/plucky version 106-2ubuntu1
* dracut-install/oracular-proposed version 103-1ubuntu3.1
* dracut-install/noble-proposed version 060+5-1ubuntu3.3
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
verification-needed-oracular
** Tags added: verification-done ve
Also merged in the upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095518
Title:
dracut-install does not install compressed wildcard blobs
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dracut into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dracut/103-1ubuntu3.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
This bug was fixed in the package dracut - 106-2ubuntu1
---
dracut (106-2ubuntu1) plucky; urgency=medium
* Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
- drop udevsettle patch (these kind of patches should be applied upstream)
- drop 90overlay-root in favor of 90overlayfs
Uploaded dracut 106-2ubuntu1 with this patch. Sponsored SRUs, but
renamed the oracular version to 103-1ubuntu3.1.
** Changed in: dracut (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/pull/1152 got merged upstream.
I'll prepare the plucky version including this fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095518
Title:
dracut-install
I spent quite a bit of time on this issue, and ended up commenting
directly on the upstream PR. I think it might be worth it to upload this
to plucky as is, but I'd wait for upstream input before SRUing, but I'd
rather defer to bdrung's opinion on this.
--
You received this bug notification becau
Upstream have not yet taken action but tagging the issue/pr for broader
notice. SRU in order not to block oem projects.
** Description changed:
+ [SRU Justificaiton]
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ Linux kernel modules may declare firmware blobs to be installed along
+ with the module itself to ensure drive
> is dracut the right place to solve this?
Yes. dracut is the one that packs initramfs.
> is kmod a more appropriate place to fix this?
This is an already established way for a kernel module to declare the
need of firmware blobs with undetermined name. kmod reads these
information, and it cannot
I suspect this is one for @bdrung particularly to review, but I'll offer
some general observations:
My first question is: is dracut the right place to solve this? If
modinfo is reporting files that don't exist, and the kernel packaging is
the thing that's creating compressed modules in the first p
Upstream pull request https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/pull/1152
** Changed in: dracut (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: dracut (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: dracut (Ubuntu Plucky)
Assignee: (unassigned) => You-Sheng Yan
Attached debdiffs for Noble/Oracular/Plucky. Jammy takes a non-trivial
backport.
Also pushed to https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/sru for
reference.
** Attachment added: "dracut_103-1ubuntu4.oracular.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095518/+attachment/5853511/+files/drac
Jammy doesn't seem to support per blob zst compression, but it still has
the same problem with xz compressed blobs.
** Description changed:
+ [Describe the bug]
+
Take kernel module intel-ish-ipc for example, it has two firmware
declarations:
```
$ modinfo intel-ish-ipc | grep ^firmwa
13 matches
Mail list logo
