Unsubscribing sponsors - the package is currently in New state in the
noble queue -
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=distribution-
gpg-keys - no further action for sponsors. Feel free to resubscribe
sponsors if needed.
--
You received this bug notification becau
I have a long reply to the ML thread half drafted, but haven't had a
chance to finish it yet. I'd appreciate having at least a week to do so,
please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20755
Reviewing the status of this during a patch pilot shift: All parties
seem agreed the packaging is reasonable. AFAICT the main objection
raised on the mailing list ("who will commit to maintain this, including
SRUs/security updates?"), is answered ("[Luca is] willing to maintain
these packages for U
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
devel/2024-September/043098.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075505
Title:
Add distribution-gpg-keys 1.104+ds-2 to noble
To manage notif
> I'm declining to process these without consensus amongst Ubuntu
developers that constant SRUs of these packages is the right
architecture to use.
I don't think "constant" is an accurate description, I don't plan to ask for a
backport for every release (there's one once a month on average or so)
Also see bug 2076416.
I'm declining to process these without consensus amongst Ubuntu
developers that constant SRUs of these packages is the right
architecture to use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Description changed:
[Impact]
distribution-gpg-keys is a package in Oracular that provides an archive
of GPG keys for RPM-based distributions.
As stated by the reporter, this package allows users to bootstrap and
build RPM distributions, useful for CI and image building purposes
It would provide more value in noble proper, however if there are
external reasons like a long review queue, I am perfectly ok with having
this in noble-backports.
I'd like to have it in the archive though rather than out of tree, as
this is useful for users of image building tool in general, to p
And similarly if there's a security revocation required, then this
wouldn't be an additional burden on the Ubuntu security team, either.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075505
Title:
The SRU review queues are backed up at the moment and future updates to
this package will take time, too. Is there any reason this can't go into
noble-backports instead, or indeed remain outside the official archive
for whatever outside-Ubuntu CI needs you have? That way, updates would
be much quic
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~lvoytek/ubuntu/+source/distribution-gpg-keys/+git/distribution-gpg-keys/+merge/470742
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075505
Ti
** Description changed:
[Impact]
+
+ distribution-gpg-keys is a package in Oracular that provides an archive
+ of GPG keys for RPM-based distributions.
+
+ As stated by the reporter, this package allows users to bootstrap and
+ build RPM distributions, useful for CI and image building purposes
12 matches
Mail list logo
