This bug was fixed in the package glusterfs - 11.1-4ubuntu0.1
---
glusterfs (11.1-4ubuntu0.1) noble; urgency=medium
* Fix stack overflow in __inode_destroy due to recursive calls to
inode_unref.
(LP: #2064843)
-- Nick O'Connor Wed, 08 May 2024 18:49:32 -0700
** Changed
DEP8 is also clear, and from comments #19 and #22 I conclude that the
test was performed from the version in proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in
Thank you that satisfies the test case, a few more day of maturing.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Zero crashes. Service uptime 1d 9h.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* Users experience brick SEGFAULTs under certain not-yet-understood
scenarios. Some reports include a high percentage of small file I/O. I
encountered the issue roughly every hour with Minio backed by GlusterFS
on ZFS.
* This bug introduces an
Packages installed and running. Looks good so far. I'll continue to
monitor it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
To manage notifications about th
Yep, I changed it to 11.1-4ubuntu0.1 when I uploaded, per that policy.
Regarding the samba autopkgtest, I've just retriggered it to re-run.
We've been having some false positive errors due to infrastructure
timeouts, and this looks like one of those.
--
You received this bug notification because
Ah, ok. Per https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-maintainers-
handbook/blob/main/VersionStrings.md#version-adding-a-change-in-ubuntu-
as-a-stable-release-update the part after the dot specifies that it's an
SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
The new version in noble-proposed is "11.1-4ubuntu0.1" vs the patch
which has "11.1-4ubuntu1". Is that expected or did I screw up the patch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title
Hello Nick, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glusterfs into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/11.1-4ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Yep! Understood. I'll install them once available.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
Thanks, I added a small conclusion to make it clear what we expect.
Please keep in mind that once the packages in noble-proposed are built,
those are the ones that need testing, even if your local builds have the
same patch, ok?
Thanks again
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* Users exp
Hi Andreas! I've updated the testing section. PTAL.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* Users experience brick SEGFAULTs under certain not-yet-understood
scenarios. Some reports include a high percentage of small file I/O. I
encountered the issue roughly every hour with Minio backed
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
To manage notifications about
@nick-oconnor, thanks for your work on this bug, specially on the
troubleshooting.
To proceed with accepting this package into noble-proposed, I would
kindly ask you to update the [Test plan] section with the conditions you
described in comment #11 that trigger the crash, even if not
immediately.
Hi Nick,
Good work on the troubleshooting analysis, and while a set of steps
didn't reveal themselves it sounds like you narrowed the conditions down
a good bit, ala "locally mounted volume which backs a Minio instance (an
S3 API compatible server) used by Restic clients (an incremental backup
sys
This bug was fixed in the package glusterfs - 11.1-4ubuntu1
---
glusterfs (11.1-4ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* Fix stack overflow in __inode_destroy due to recursive calls to
inode_unref.
(LP: #2064843)
-- Nick O'Connor Wed, 08 May 2024 18:49:32 -0700
** Changed i
Hi Bryce!
I really appreciate you getting this submitted.
I took a day and looked through the code/tests for GlusterFS and
couldn't figure out how to reliably trigger the crash. For my system, I
experienced brick crashes about once per hour, but only with specific
volumes. For instance, the volum
For the noble SRU, I've also sponsored the upload of the package for
you:
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading glusterfs_11.1-4ubuntu0.1.dsc: done.
Uploading glusterfs_11.1-4ubuntu0.1.debian.tar.xz: done.
Uploading glusterfs_11.1-4ubuntu0.1_source.buildinfo: done.
Hi Nick,
Sorry for the delay - Athos got tied up with another project, but I can
help in moving this forward.
Thank you for the links to the upstream history, and from that it
appears this is only affecting glusterfs 11.x, thus correctly targets
noble and oracular.
I've reviewed your debdiff and
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro) => Bryce Harrington (bryce)
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro) => Bryce Harrington (bryce)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro)
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: Nick O'Connor (nick-oconnor) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
To manage no
This is ready for review/sponsorship
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
** Patch added: "fix-stack-overflow-in-inode-destroy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/2064843/+attachment/5778935/+files/fix-stack-overflow-in-inode-destroy.debdiff
** Patch removed: "fix-stack-overflow-in-inode-destroy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/u
** Patch added: "fix-stack-overflow-in-inode-destroy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/2064843/+attachment/5778934/+files/fix-stack-overflow-in-inode-destroy.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
** Summary changed:
- Gluster 11.1 brick SEGFAULT
+ Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843
Title:
Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1
To manage notifications about this
27 matches
Mail list logo
