> Is the intention to make rust 1.76.0 the default rustc in noble (==
'rustc'), or to introduce it as an additional rustc-1.76 package?
It will be made default, and then LP#2054748 will transition this package to
rustc-1.76 instead of rustc.
> what rebuild testing has been done on the reverse-d
Is the intention to make rust 1.76.0 the default rustc in noble (==
'rustc'), or to introduce it as an additional rustc-1.76 package?
If the former, what rebuild testing has been done on the reverse-
dependencies, to judge the impact on releasability of noble?
** Changed in: rustc (Ubuntu)
Converted to FFe bug since it is impossible to get Rust 1.76 uploaded
before feature freeze due to armhf time_t transition.
** Summary changed:
- Upgrade Rust to 1.76.0
+ [FFe] Upgrade Rust to 1.76.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri