This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-meta - 1.98
---
ubuntu-meta (1.98) hardy; urgency=low
* Refreshed dependencies
* Added bash-completion to standard-recommends-i386, standard-
recommends-amd64, standard-recommends-powerpc, standard-recommends-
ia64, standard-recomme
I added it to the 'standard' platform seed as recommends. The next
update of *-meta packages will have it again.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Wishlist => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
include bas
MIR approved, promoted to main.
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Please make sure that bash-completion is added and to Hardy before the
final release, this is by default something that most users require, and
also assists with user support.
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification
Murat, thanks for the information. However, as I said above I will not
spend any time trying to get bash-completion into main. My time to spend
on bash-completion is limited and I'd rather fix the bugs and get them
upstream (or assume maintainership). It does not make sense to fix these
bugs just i
Mika, the standard procedure for moving a package from Universe to Main
involves writing a main inclusion report and discussing the necessary
changes on the development mailing lists. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess for details.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: U
Good to know that, I have noticed that the package got updated several
times in the alpha period but the version says: 20060301-3ubuntu1 -
that's why I thought it wasn't maintained. My fault about that, really
sorry :)
Well, if that's the case then I don't see a reason not to include it. It
provid
Hi Savvas,
as I said above, I'm de-facto the maintainer for Ubuntu, having fixed
the most annoying bugs in the last upload and fixing most of the others
in the next.
I'd also consider taking over upstream maintainership but I'd like to
talk to the current upstream maintainer about that first. He
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
well whoever marked my bug as duplicate, should notice that the package is
ubuntu-meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/195163
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Con
And from what I understand, bash-completion needs a maintainer :)
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
Hi Åskar,
while what you say is definitely true, the real question is who to poke
and what process to follow to get bash to depend on it.
And actually I'd rather suggest that ubuntu-standard recommend it so
that people can remove it if they're bothered.
In any case I think that bash-completion w
If it is made a dependency of bash, it will be installed by default I
think
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
I try to actively maintain the Ubuntu package and I think after the last
upload it is in pretty good shape (before that it was rather broken).
I'm in the process of fixing a few more bugs and also rewriting some
things that could be done more robustly.
I'm also trying to get in contact with Ian Ma
Try convincing upstream to maintain bash-completion.
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
I agree too - it's a really, really nice feature that helps novices and
also helps to convince experts that Ubuntu is a nice distribution.
Surely it can't be that hard to keep this included and maintained?
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You r
I strongly agree that bash autocompletion should be included by default.
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: bash => bash-completion
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
+1
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/
According to the changelog [1], bash-completion is now unsupported
upstream. This may be the reason it's not being installed by default.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash-completion
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You receive
I agree with Bruno Patri, make it a dependency
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
Since bash-completion is now in a separate package, it should be a
dependency of bash (not only recommended). The file list of bash package
should be also updated because /etc/bash_completion is no longer in this
package.
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: bash-completion => bash
--
+1 I completely agree with everyone here. This is a "must have" feature,
and not including it by default is a regression.
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
+1 ! I even thought it was some kind of bug ! Very bad regression indeed
:-(
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
I do strongly agree... Installing packages and working fast on the commandline
without autocompletion since Alpha 5 is a mess...
I first thought it would be a bug and looked up all my bashrc config files but
autocompletion was enabled per-user already. I tried enabling it in the global
/etc/bash
Yes, please do include it again. Just because a user shouldn't have to
use the command line is no reason to cripple it - surely it can't take
up that much space on the CD?
** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
include bash-completion by default in hardy
https
26 matches
Mail list logo
