This bug was fixed in the package netplan.io - 0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.1
---
netplan.io (0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan.io 0.103-0ubuntu5 to 20.04 (LP: #1938920)
- Add YAML generator and Keyfile parser for NetworkManager YAML backend
- Add acti
This bug was fixed in the package netplan.io - 0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.1
---
netplan.io (0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.1) hirsute; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan.io 0.103-0ubuntu5 to 21.04 (LP: #1938920)
- Add YAML generator and Keyfile parser for NetworkManager YAML backend
- Add ac
** Tags removed: verification-needed-done
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938920
Title:
[SRU] Update to netplan.io 0.103
To manage notification
Thank you for the comments Łukasz, I'll keep them in mind for next time.
For Hirsute:
I tested netplan.io 0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.1 and attached the official
autopkgtest logs, all passed. The initramfs-tools/0.139ubuntu3 (amd64) reverse
dependency test passed as well after a re-try.
Also I verifie
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This release contains both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to
make sure all of our supported customers have access to those improvements.
The most notable changes (besides usual bug-fixes) incoming in 0.103:
- Add YAML generator and Keyfile
the netplan.io SRU for bionic is needed for:
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10212 – but it's not a big
version bump, but only a small targeted feature backport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Hello Lukas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted netplan.io into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
btw. I also see you uploaded a new netplan version for bionic. Is there
any need for that? We didn't upgrade netplan.io for quite a while - this
will be basically a jump from 0.99 to 0.102, so 3 versions.
I'll skip it for now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Thanks for working on these SRUs! Those seem to look good. One
recommendation for the future: with ubuntu5 there has been a lot of
patches that you have added to fix minor issues here and there, and
those are not mentioned in the changelog directly. Since those are out-
of-tree for the tarball, I f
I've re-uploaded the hirsute and focal SRUs, after doing some pre-
testing in a PPA, adding a patch to mute the gateway4/6 deprecating
warnings.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938920
T
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This release contains both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to
make sure all of our supported customers have access to those improvements.
The most notable changes (besides usual bug-fixes) incoming in 0.103:
- Add YAML generator and Keyfile
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This release contains both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to
make sure all of our supported customers have access to those improvements.
The most notable changes (besides usual bug-fixes) incoming in 0.103:
- Add YAML generator and Keyfile
Thanks, those are some fair points and we will be working on them.
It makes perfect sense to remove the deprecation warnings for the stable
releases! That way we would also notice the change (while rebasing
stable-series patches), should we ever decide to fully deprecate that feature.
I had a Hi
> Anyway, maybe just removing the deprecation notice as a delta for
focal/hirsute could be an option?
Yes - this is what I meant. The concept of "deprecation" is only related
to what promises we're making to users about the future, so there aren't
any code changes needed, just documentation change
I think Robie has a point here. I think there were times where we 'JFDI'
regarding backporting everything along with deprecation messages, but
mainly because we weren't really aware or missed it during review. I
don't have a strong opinion, since this is just a deprecation warning so
my personal fe
> - Deprecate gateway4 & gateway6 in favor of defaults routes (LP:
#1756590)
I'm not sure this is acceptable to land in a stable release. By all
means provide a new and cleaner mechanism, and change the documentation
to advise the newer method. However, actually printing a deprecation
notice on F
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938920
Title:
[SRU] Update to netplan.io 0.103
To manage notifications ab
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This release contains both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to
make sure all of our supported customers have access to those improvements.
The most notable changes (besides usual bug-fixes) incoming in 0.103:
- Add YAML generator and Keyfile
18 matches
Mail list logo
